Spinal cord transplants enhance the recovery of locomotor function after spinal cord injury at birth.

Fetal spinal cord transplants placed into the site of a neonatal spinal cord lesion after the response of immature CNS neurons to injury. The transplants prevent the retrograde cell death of immature axotomized neurons and support the growth of axons into and through the site of injury. In the present experiments we used a battery of locomotor tasks to determine if these transplants are also capable of promoting the recovery of motor function after spinal cord injury at birth. Embryonic (E14) spinal cord transplants were placed into the site of a spinal cord "over-hemisection" in rat pups. Three groups of animals were used: 1) normal control animals, 2) animals with a spinal cord hemisection only, and 3) animals with a spinal cord transplant at the site of the hemisection. Eight to twelve weeks later, the animals were trained and videotaped while crossing runways requiring accurate foot placement and footprinted while walking on a treadmill. The videotapes and footprints were analyzed to obtain quantitative measures of locomotor function. Footprint analysis revealed that the animals' base of support during locomotion was increased by a neonatal hemisection. The base of support in animals with transplants was similar to control values. Animals with a hemisection rotated their hindlimbs further laterally than did control animals during locomotion. A transplant at the site of injury modified this response. Normal animals were able to cross a grid runway quickly with only a few errors. In contrast, animals with a hemisection took a longer time and made more errors while crossing. The presence of a transplant at the site of injury enabled the animals to cross the grid more quickly and to make fewer errors than the animals with a hemisection only. Animals that received the transplants demonstrated qualitative and quantitative improvements in several parameters of locomotion. Spinal cord transplants at the site of neonatal spinal cord injury result in enhanced sparing or recovery of motor function. We suggest that this transplant induced recovery of function is a consequence of the anatomical plasticity elicited by the transplants.