International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025
Enhancing early mortality prediction for sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome patients via optimized machine learning algorithm: development and multiple databases' validation of the SAFE-Mo.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jiang Luofeng, Yu Chuting, Xie Chaoran, Zheng Yongjun, Xia Zhaofan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with high mortality, with sepsis accounts for 31-34% of cases. Given the global burden of sepsis (508 cases per 100 000 person-years) and its association with 20% of all global deaths, early mortality prediction in patients with sepsis-associated ARDS is critical. This study developed and validated the Sepsis-associated ARDS Fatality Evaluation Model (SAFE-Mo), a machine learning (ML) model designed to predict early mortality in sepsis-associated ARDS patients, enabling earlier identification of high-risk individuals.
METHODS: Data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV, v3.0), eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU CRD, v2.0), and Northwest ICU (NWICU, v0.1.0) using Structured Query Language (SQL). SAFE-Mo was constructed using ML algorithm (svmRadialSigma) focusing on median survival days among deceased patients as the primary outcome. The model's performance was validated externally using the MIMIC-IV and eICU CRD database and compared against four commonly used clinical risk assessment models (acute physiology score III (APSIII), simplified acute physiology score II (SAPS II), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI)). Additionally, NWICU was used to further validate SAFE-Mo's generalization. Discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), Decision Curve Analysis (DCA), and calibration curves.
RESULTS: SAFE-Mo demonstrated superior predictive capability of early mortality compared to traditional models. It showed the largest reasonable risk threshold probability range and highest net benefit. Calibration curves indicated a slight overestimation of mortality risk overall. With our simple SAFE-Mo web page, SAFE-Mo can assist clinicians in identifying high-risk patients early, like patients with unusually high levels of lactate in sepsis-associated ARDS, assessing prognosis, and facilitating risk-adjusted comparisons of center-specific outcomes. Practical advantages include guiding personalized treatment strategies, determining the need for aggressive interventions, and optimizing resource utilization.
CONCLUSION: This study utilized the MIMIC-IV, eICU CRD, and NWICU databases to construct and validate a ML model, SAFE-Mo, which predicts early mortality in patients with sepsis-associated ARDS and outperforms traditional prediction models across all metrics. SAFE-Mo can guide clinicians to focus on critical indicators such as lactate, urine output, anion gap, and others, enabling appropriate measures to improve clinical outcomes for high-risk patients.
METHODS: Data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV, v3.0), eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU CRD, v2.0), and Northwest ICU (NWICU, v0.1.0) using Structured Query Language (SQL). SAFE-Mo was constructed using ML algorithm (svmRadialSigma) focusing on median survival days among deceased patients as the primary outcome. The model's performance was validated externally using the MIMIC-IV and eICU CRD database and compared against four commonly used clinical risk assessment models (acute physiology score III (APSIII), simplified acute physiology score II (SAPS II), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI)). Additionally, NWICU was used to further validate SAFE-Mo's generalization. Discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), Decision Curve Analysis (DCA), and calibration curves.
RESULTS: SAFE-Mo demonstrated superior predictive capability of early mortality compared to traditional models. It showed the largest reasonable risk threshold probability range and highest net benefit. Calibration curves indicated a slight overestimation of mortality risk overall. With our simple SAFE-Mo web page, SAFE-Mo can assist clinicians in identifying high-risk patients early, like patients with unusually high levels of lactate in sepsis-associated ARDS, assessing prognosis, and facilitating risk-adjusted comparisons of center-specific outcomes. Practical advantages include guiding personalized treatment strategies, determining the need for aggressive interventions, and optimizing resource utilization.
CONCLUSION: This study utilized the MIMIC-IV, eICU CRD, and NWICU databases to construct and validate a ML model, SAFE-Mo, which predicts early mortality in patients with sepsis-associated ARDS and outperforms traditional prediction models across all metrics. SAFE-Mo can guide clinicians to focus on critical indicators such as lactate, urine output, anion gap, and others, enabling appropriate measures to improve clinical outcomes for high-risk patients.