Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2010
A peri-trigonal giant tumefactive cavernous malformation: case report and review of literature.
Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Thakar Sumit, Furtado Sunil V, Ghosal Nandita, Hegde A S
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Giant cavernous malformations (GCMs) constitute an uncommon entity in the diagnostic armamentarium of the neurosurgeon. We report a 3-year-old boy with a GCM in the peri-trigonal region and review 13 other paediatric cases previously reported in literature.
CASE: A 3-year-old boy presented with right-sided hemiparesis and features of raised intracranial pressure of short duration. Computed tomography showed a large left peri-trigonal mass with a bleed. Magnetic resonance imaging showed associated perilesional edema and mass effect, rendering the lesion a tumefactive appearance. He underwent total excision of the lesion, with subsequent recovery of hemiparesis. Histopathology was reported as a cavernoma.
DISCUSSION: The clinico-radiological presentation of GCM is discussed based on a case report and relevant cases in literature. Good surgical outcome can be expected with total microsurgical excision.
CONCLUSION: A giant cavernous malformation should be one of the differentials of a lesion with a tumefactive clinico-radiological presentation in children. There should be a high index of suspicion for such a diagnosis, especially when the lesion does not enhance with contrast. This is the third case report in paediatric literature describing a periventricular location of this unusual lesion.
CASE: A 3-year-old boy presented with right-sided hemiparesis and features of raised intracranial pressure of short duration. Computed tomography showed a large left peri-trigonal mass with a bleed. Magnetic resonance imaging showed associated perilesional edema and mass effect, rendering the lesion a tumefactive appearance. He underwent total excision of the lesion, with subsequent recovery of hemiparesis. Histopathology was reported as a cavernoma.
DISCUSSION: The clinico-radiological presentation of GCM is discussed based on a case report and relevant cases in literature. Good surgical outcome can be expected with total microsurgical excision.
CONCLUSION: A giant cavernous malformation should be one of the differentials of a lesion with a tumefactive clinico-radiological presentation in children. There should be a high index of suspicion for such a diagnosis, especially when the lesion does not enhance with contrast. This is the third case report in paediatric literature describing a periventricular location of this unusual lesion.