The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2012
Transcutaneous aortic valve implantation using the left carotid access: feasibility and early clinical outcomes.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Modine Thomas, Sudre Arnaud, Delhaye Cedric, Fayad Georges, Lemesle Gilles, Collet Frederic, Koussa Mohamad
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In some patients, transfemoral, transaxillary, or transapical aortic valve implantation is not possible. Thus, carotid artery access may represent a safe alternative to those accesses, and even offers certain advantages. In this article, we describe aortic valve implantation using the left carotid arterial approach and report our initial experience.
METHODS: Using a self-expandable nitinol based device (CoreValve ReValving system, Medtronic Ltd, Luxembourg), we exposed the left carotid artery through a small incision. Arterial puncture and initial 6F sheath introduction were achieved through a contraincision. The same implantation technique as for transaxillary implantation was used. Progressive artery dilatation was achieved using sheaths of increasing diameter. Rapid ventricular pacing was used to reduce cardiac output while performing a routine aortic balloon valvuloplasty. Only then, an 18F sheath was inserted into the carotid artery and pushed down into the ascending aorta. The patients were monitored using cerebral oxymetry to assess cerebral perfusion.
RESULTS: Twelve consecutive patients, at high surgical risk, were implanted and studied prospectively. Transfemoral and subclavian catheterization were considered unfeasible or at risk of severe complications. Carotid arterial injury did not occur in any patient. A transient ischemic attack occurred in 1 patient, contralateral to the carotid access. There were no deaths in either intraprocedural or during the 30-day follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS: This initial experience suggests that left carotid transarterial aortic valve implantation, in selected high-risk patients, is feasible and safe with satisfactory short-term outcomes.
METHODS: Using a self-expandable nitinol based device (CoreValve ReValving system, Medtronic Ltd, Luxembourg), we exposed the left carotid artery through a small incision. Arterial puncture and initial 6F sheath introduction were achieved through a contraincision. The same implantation technique as for transaxillary implantation was used. Progressive artery dilatation was achieved using sheaths of increasing diameter. Rapid ventricular pacing was used to reduce cardiac output while performing a routine aortic balloon valvuloplasty. Only then, an 18F sheath was inserted into the carotid artery and pushed down into the ascending aorta. The patients were monitored using cerebral oxymetry to assess cerebral perfusion.
RESULTS: Twelve consecutive patients, at high surgical risk, were implanted and studied prospectively. Transfemoral and subclavian catheterization were considered unfeasible or at risk of severe complications. Carotid arterial injury did not occur in any patient. A transient ischemic attack occurred in 1 patient, contralateral to the carotid access. There were no deaths in either intraprocedural or during the 30-day follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS: This initial experience suggests that left carotid transarterial aortic valve implantation, in selected high-risk patients, is feasible and safe with satisfactory short-term outcomes.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Age FactorsAgedAged, 80 and overAortic Valve StenosisCardiac CatheterizationCarotid ArteriesEchocardiography, DopplerFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGeriatric AssessmentHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHumansMaleMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPatient SelectionProspective StudiesPuncturesRadiography, InterventionalRisk AssessmentSingle-Blind MethodTreatment Outcome