Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024
Validation of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging techniques in head and neck healthy structures involved in the salivary and swallowing function: Accuracy and repeatability.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Guerreiro F, van Houdt P J, Navest R J M, Hoekstra N, de Jong M, Heijnen B J, Zijlema S E, Verbist B, van der Heide U A, Astreinidou E
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiation-induced damage to the organs at risk (OARs) in head-and-neck cancer (HNC) patient can result in long-term complications. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), DIXON for fat fraction (FF) estimation and T2 mapping could potentially provide a spatial assessment of such damage. The goal of this study is to validate these qMRI techniques in terms of accuracy in phantoms and repeatability in-vivo across a broad selection of healthy OARs in the HN region.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Scanning was performed at a 3 T diagnostic MRI scanner, including the calculation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from DWI, FF and T2 maps. Phantoms were scanned to estimate the qMRI techniques bias using Bland-Altman statistics. Twenty-six healthy subjects were scanned twice in a test-retest study to determine repeatability. Repeatability coefficients (RC) were calculated for the parotid, submandibular, sublingual and tubarial salivary glands, oral cavity, pharyngeal constrictor muscle and brainstem. Additionally, a linear mixed-effect model analysis was used to evaluate the effect of subject-specific characteristics on the qMRI values.
RESULTS: Bias was 0.009x10-3 mm2/s for ADC, -0.7 % for FF and -7.9 ms for T2. RCs ranged 0.11-0.25x10-3 mm2/s for ADC, 1.2-6.3 % for FF and 2.5-6.3 ms for T2. A significant positive linear relationship between age and the FF and T2 for some of the OARs was found.
CONCLUSION: These qMRI techniques are feasible, accurate and repeatable, which is promising for treatment response monitoring and/or differentiating between healthy and unhealthy tissues due to radiation-induced damage in HNC patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Scanning was performed at a 3 T diagnostic MRI scanner, including the calculation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from DWI, FF and T2 maps. Phantoms were scanned to estimate the qMRI techniques bias using Bland-Altman statistics. Twenty-six healthy subjects were scanned twice in a test-retest study to determine repeatability. Repeatability coefficients (RC) were calculated for the parotid, submandibular, sublingual and tubarial salivary glands, oral cavity, pharyngeal constrictor muscle and brainstem. Additionally, a linear mixed-effect model analysis was used to evaluate the effect of subject-specific characteristics on the qMRI values.
RESULTS: Bias was 0.009x10-3 mm2/s for ADC, -0.7 % for FF and -7.9 ms for T2. RCs ranged 0.11-0.25x10-3 mm2/s for ADC, 1.2-6.3 % for FF and 2.5-6.3 ms for T2. A significant positive linear relationship between age and the FF and T2 for some of the OARs was found.
CONCLUSION: These qMRI techniques are feasible, accurate and repeatable, which is promising for treatment response monitoring and/or differentiating between healthy and unhealthy tissues due to radiation-induced damage in HNC patients.