Acta diabetologica · 2026
Role of automated insulin delivery (AID) systems in glucose control in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing dialysis in Calabria: AID-DIAL-CAL.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Succurro Elena, Cersosimo Giuseppe, Sarnelli Paola, Brisinda Francesco, Gattuso Ilaria, Mazza Valeria, Fabiano Giuseppe, Iorio Fiorella, Arena Roberta, Mazzitello Giovanni, Nicotera Ramona, Capria Maria, Zaza Gianluigi, Andreucci Michele, Mancini Raffaele, Andreozzi Francesco
Аннотация
AIMS: To describe the main glycemic outcomes and the Quality of Life (QOL) observed in a cohort of people with type 1 (T1D) or type 2 (T2D) insulin-treated diabetes under dialysis who started an Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) system.
METHODS: This is a longitudinal retrospective pilot real-world analysis of 14 individuals with T1D and T2D undergoing dialysis who began using an AID system to optimize glycemic control. All subjects used the MiniMed™ 780G system. Glucose metrics were collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months after initiating the SmartGuard™ feature. The WHOQoL-Bref questionnaire was administered at the last follow-up to evaluate the QOL.
RESULTS: Out of the 14 people, 8 reached 1-year follow-up. Time in Range (TIR) increased from 63% at baseline to 69% at 12 months, Time Below Range < 70 mg/dL (TBR70) decreased from 0.3% to 0%, and Time Above Range > 250 mg/dL (TAR250) decreased from 6.7% to 3.9%. Seven out of eight subjects who reached a 12-month follow-up achieved all three glycemic targets for this fragile population (TIR > 50%, TBR70 < 1% and TAR250 < 10%). At the last follow-up, 58.3% of the users were satisfied or very satisfied with their health status, versus only 25% with the previous treatment, and 81.7% had a good or very good QOL, whereas only 8.3% had a good QOL, and no one had a very good QOL with the previous treatment.
CONCLUSION: This pilot real-world study showed how the use of an AID system is safe and can help to improve the glycemic outcomes and the QOL of people with diabetes in dialysis.
METHODS: This is a longitudinal retrospective pilot real-world analysis of 14 individuals with T1D and T2D undergoing dialysis who began using an AID system to optimize glycemic control. All subjects used the MiniMed™ 780G system. Glucose metrics were collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months after initiating the SmartGuard™ feature. The WHOQoL-Bref questionnaire was administered at the last follow-up to evaluate the QOL.
RESULTS: Out of the 14 people, 8 reached 1-year follow-up. Time in Range (TIR) increased from 63% at baseline to 69% at 12 months, Time Below Range < 70 mg/dL (TBR70) decreased from 0.3% to 0%, and Time Above Range > 250 mg/dL (TAR250) decreased from 6.7% to 3.9%. Seven out of eight subjects who reached a 12-month follow-up achieved all three glycemic targets for this fragile population (TIR > 50%, TBR70 < 1% and TAR250 < 10%). At the last follow-up, 58.3% of the users were satisfied or very satisfied with their health status, versus only 25% with the previous treatment, and 81.7% had a good or very good QOL, whereas only 8.3% had a good QOL, and no one had a very good QOL with the previous treatment.
CONCLUSION: This pilot real-world study showed how the use of an AID system is safe and can help to improve the glycemic outcomes and the QOL of people with diabetes in dialysis.