Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2012
Impact of radial-to-aorta vascular anatomical variants on risk of failure in trans-radial coronary procedures.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Burzotta Francesco, Brancati Marta Francesca, Trani Carlo, Tommasino Antonella, Porto Italo, Niccoli Giampaolo, Leone Antonio Maria, Coluccia Valentina, Di Noi Paola, Crea Filippo
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of an "operative" classification of vascular anatomic variants on the feasibility of trans-radial approach.
BACKGROUND: Vascular anatomic variants located from the wrist to the aorta may influence the feasibility of trans-radial procedures. Recently, a new "operative" classification of these variants was proposed.
METHODS: Consecutive trans-radial diagnostic or interventional catheterizations were considered. Vascular anatomic variants were classified according to 10 categories and sub-grouped according to the ABC classification (A: radial-brachial arterial axis; B: axillary-subclavian-anonymous axis; C: aortic arch). Primary study end-point was failure of trans-radial approach (necessity to cross-over to another approach to complete the procedure).
RESULTS: Three thousand four hundred seventy-seven consecutive radial procedures were considered. Anatomic variants were diagnosed in 308 procedures (8.8%): A variants: 7.2%, B variants: 1.9%; C variants: 0.3%. Failure occurred in 2.0% of procedures. Failure rate was 0.7% in the absence of variants vs.15.2% in the presence of any variant (P < 0.0001, OR 27.7, 95%CI 16.3-46.9). Each of the 10 variants was significantly associated with increased failure rate. Each of the three level-subgroups of variants was significantly associated to the risk of failure (failure 14.7% in A level, 13.9% in B level, 33.3% in C level; P < 0.0001 vs. absence of variants).
CONCLUSIONS: Failure of trans-radial procedures is associated to anatomic variants located from the wrist to the aorta. The "operative" ABC classification of anatomic variants is useful not only to categorize these anatomic variants, but also to predict the risk of failure of trans-radial approach.
BACKGROUND: Vascular anatomic variants located from the wrist to the aorta may influence the feasibility of trans-radial procedures. Recently, a new "operative" classification of these variants was proposed.
METHODS: Consecutive trans-radial diagnostic or interventional catheterizations were considered. Vascular anatomic variants were classified according to 10 categories and sub-grouped according to the ABC classification (A: radial-brachial arterial axis; B: axillary-subclavian-anonymous axis; C: aortic arch). Primary study end-point was failure of trans-radial approach (necessity to cross-over to another approach to complete the procedure).
RESULTS: Three thousand four hundred seventy-seven consecutive radial procedures were considered. Anatomic variants were diagnosed in 308 procedures (8.8%): A variants: 7.2%, B variants: 1.9%; C variants: 0.3%. Failure occurred in 2.0% of procedures. Failure rate was 0.7% in the absence of variants vs.15.2% in the presence of any variant (P < 0.0001, OR 27.7, 95%CI 16.3-46.9). Each of the 10 variants was significantly associated with increased failure rate. Each of the three level-subgroups of variants was significantly associated to the risk of failure (failure 14.7% in A level, 13.9% in B level, 33.3% in C level; P < 0.0001 vs. absence of variants).
CONCLUSIONS: Failure of trans-radial procedures is associated to anatomic variants located from the wrist to the aorta. The "operative" ABC classification of anatomic variants is useful not only to categorize these anatomic variants, but also to predict the risk of failure of trans-radial approach.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAortaAortographyAxillary ArteryBrachial ArteryCardiac CatheterizationChi-Square DistributionCoronary AngiographyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPatient SelectionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPredictive Value of TestsRadial ArteryRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSubclavian ArteryTreatment FailureVascular Malformations