The Medical journal of Australia · 1992
Laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Maher P J, Wood E C, Hill D J, Lolatgis N A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy.
DESIGN: A prospective study of the planned surgical procedure was carried out by two teams, each with two gynaecologists, who were experienced in operative laparoscopy.
SETTING: The operations were carried out in a private hospital, where advanced operative laparoscopy equipment was available.
PATIENTS: Seventeen patients were selected for the procedure, all of whom required hysterectomy for symptoms of pain or menorrhagia in association with uterine or other pelvic disease. Patients with carcinoma or uterine enlargement beyond 12 cm were excluded.
PROCEDURE: Laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy was carried out by means of a video monitor, uterine manipulation by vaginal instrumentation, three or four abdominal punctures of less than 1 cm, and bipolar diathermy to secure vascular pedicles. The uterus was removed from the vagina by cutting vaginal skin and the cardinal ligaments.
RESULTS: The operating time was 90-220 min, the blood loss was 30-200 mL, and the hospital stay lasted two to five days and convalescence two to four weeks. No serious complications occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy may be valuable when adnexal or uterine abnormalities are present and vaginal hysterectomy is either contraindicated or more difficult. The procedure requires special equipment and may only be carried out by experienced gynaecological operative laparoscopists. Its acceptance will depend upon reducing the operating time to less than 90 min. It has the advantage of reducing the duration of hospital stay and the duration of convalescence when compared with abdominal hysterectomy.
DESIGN: A prospective study of the planned surgical procedure was carried out by two teams, each with two gynaecologists, who were experienced in operative laparoscopy.
SETTING: The operations were carried out in a private hospital, where advanced operative laparoscopy equipment was available.
PATIENTS: Seventeen patients were selected for the procedure, all of whom required hysterectomy for symptoms of pain or menorrhagia in association with uterine or other pelvic disease. Patients with carcinoma or uterine enlargement beyond 12 cm were excluded.
PROCEDURE: Laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy was carried out by means of a video monitor, uterine manipulation by vaginal instrumentation, three or four abdominal punctures of less than 1 cm, and bipolar diathermy to secure vascular pedicles. The uterus was removed from the vagina by cutting vaginal skin and the cardinal ligaments.
RESULTS: The operating time was 90-220 min, the blood loss was 30-200 mL, and the hospital stay lasted two to five days and convalescence two to four weeks. No serious complications occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy may be valuable when adnexal or uterine abnormalities are present and vaginal hysterectomy is either contraindicated or more difficult. The procedure requires special equipment and may only be carried out by experienced gynaecological operative laparoscopists. Its acceptance will depend upon reducing the operating time to less than 90 min. It has the advantage of reducing the duration of hospital stay and the duration of convalescence when compared with abdominal hysterectomy.