MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4166/kjg.2010.55.1.46

Медицинская библиотека · The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2010

[Clinical analysis of stercoral perforation of the colon].

Nam Jung Kwang, Kim Byung Seok, Kim Kyung Soo, Moon Duk Jin

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND/AIMS: A stercoral perforation of the colon (SPC) is a rare, life-threatening disease. The aim of this study was to represent the definition of SPC and help the diagnosis and treatment of this condition.

METHODS

We reviewed 92 medical records of patients who underwent operation due to colonic perforation from January 2000 to February 2009 retrospectively. Maurers diagnostic criteria were used for the diagnosis of SPC.

RESULTS

Eight patients (8.7%) were diagnosed as SPC. The age of the patients ranged from 59 to 85 years old. All of the patients were female and had a history of long-standing constipation. Only two patients (25%) were diagnosed as SPC preoperatively. The site of perforation of all patients was sigmoid colon. The methods of operation were Hartmanns procedure (7 cases), and primary repair with sigmoid loop colostomy (1 case). There were one recurrence and two deaths (25%) due to sepsis and multiple organ failure.

CONCLUSIONS

SPC should be considered in chronically constipated, and bedridden patients who present with acute abdomen. Hartmanns procedure is the treatment of choice in most situations. Mortality is high but can be minimized with early definitive surgery.

Для цитирования: Nam Jung Kwang, Kim Byung Seok, Kim Kyung Soo, Moon Duk Jin. [Clinical analysis of stercoral perforation of the colon].. The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi. 2010. DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2010.55.1.46.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.