International journal of burns and trauma · 2021
A descriptive survey of operating theatre and intensive care unit temperature management of burn patients in the United Kingdom.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mullhi Randeep, Ewington Ian, Chipp Elizabeth, Torlinski Tomasz
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Patients with major burns lose the normal thermoregulatory function of their skin. They exhibit profound changes in metabolism which aim to compensate for the heat loss associated with water loss through burnt skin. Although these changes in physiology are well documented, the optimal methods for temperature management in both the Operating Theatre and Intensive Care Unit are less clear.
METHODS: We distributed a survey consisting of 19 questions to all burn units and centres in the United Kingdom with the aim of ascertaining perception of both hypo and hyperthermia, as well as methods used to manage both of these scenarios.
RESULTS: In the Operating Theatre, most respondents stated that they measured core temperature (82%); either alone (33%) or in conjunction with peripheral temperature (49%). In the Intensive Care Unit, most respondents measured both core and peripheral temperature (67%), with only a small minority not measuring core temperature (13%). Taking into consideration all professional groups, patients were considered hypothermic if their body temperature was less than 36.2°C (+/-0.7°C). On average, a patient was considered hyperthermic if their body temperature was above 38.8°C (+/-0.6°C).
CONCLUSION: Differences in perception between the professional groups surveyed did not reach clinical or statistical significance. In both the Operating Theatre and Intensive Care Unit, hypothermia was most often managed by increasing the ambient room temperature whereas hyperthermia was most often managed by giving paracetamol. As far as we are aware, this is the first study of the management of altered thermoregulation in major burn patients in the United Kingdom.
METHODS: We distributed a survey consisting of 19 questions to all burn units and centres in the United Kingdom with the aim of ascertaining perception of both hypo and hyperthermia, as well as methods used to manage both of these scenarios.
RESULTS: In the Operating Theatre, most respondents stated that they measured core temperature (82%); either alone (33%) or in conjunction with peripheral temperature (49%). In the Intensive Care Unit, most respondents measured both core and peripheral temperature (67%), with only a small minority not measuring core temperature (13%). Taking into consideration all professional groups, patients were considered hypothermic if their body temperature was less than 36.2°C (+/-0.7°C). On average, a patient was considered hyperthermic if their body temperature was above 38.8°C (+/-0.6°C).
CONCLUSION: Differences in perception between the professional groups surveyed did not reach clinical or statistical significance. In both the Operating Theatre and Intensive Care Unit, hypothermia was most often managed by increasing the ambient room temperature whereas hyperthermia was most often managed by giving paracetamol. As far as we are aware, this is the first study of the management of altered thermoregulation in major burn patients in the United Kingdom.