Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023
Radiation therapy margin reduction for patients with localized prostate cancer: A prospective study of the dosimetric impact and quality of life.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kumarasiri Akila, Chetty Indrin J, Devpura Suneetha, Pradhan Deepak, Aref Ibrahim, Elshaikh Mohamed A, Movsas Benjamin
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of reducing Clinical Target Volume (CTV) to Planning Target Volume (PTV) margins on delivered radiation therapy (RT) dose and patient reported quality-of-life (QOL) for patients with localized prostate cancer.
METHODS: Twenty patients were included in a single institution IRB-approved prospective study. Nine were planned with reduced margins (4 mm at prostate/rectum interface, 5 mm elsewhere), and 11 with standard margins (6/10 mm). Cumulative delivered dose was calculated using deformable dose accumulation. Each daily CBCT dataset was deformed to the planning CT (pCT), dose was computed, and accumulated on the resampled pCT using a parameter-optimized, B-spline algorithm (Elastix, ITK/VTK). EPIC-26 patient reported QOL was prospectively collected pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at 2-, 6-, 12-, 18-, 24-, 36-, 48-, and 60-month follow-ups. Post -RT QOL scores were baseline corrected and standardized to a [0-100] scale using EPIC-26 methodology. Correlations between QOL scores and dosimetric parameters were investigated, and the overall QOL differences between the two groups (QOLMargin-reduced -QOLcontrol ) were calculated.
RESULTS: The median QOL follow-up length for the 20 patients was 48 months. Difference between delivered dose and planned dose did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.1) for both targets and organs at risk between the two groups. At 4 years post-RT, standardized mean QOLMargin-reduced -QOLcontrol were improved for Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Irritative/Obstructive, Bowel, and Sexual EPIC domains by 3.5, 14.8, 10.2, and 16.1, respectively (higher values better). The control group showed larger PTV/rectum and PTV/bladder intersection volumes (7.2 ± 5.8, 18.2 ± 8.1 cc) than the margin-reduced group (2.6 ± 1.8, 12.5 ± 8.3 cc), though the dose to these intersection volumes did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.1) between the groups. PTV/rectum intersection volume showed a moderate correlation (r = -0.56, p < 0.05) to Bowel EPIC domain.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of this prospective study showed that margin-reduced group exhibited clinically meaningful improvement of QOL without compromising the target dose coverage.
METHODS: Twenty patients were included in a single institution IRB-approved prospective study. Nine were planned with reduced margins (4 mm at prostate/rectum interface, 5 mm elsewhere), and 11 with standard margins (6/10 mm). Cumulative delivered dose was calculated using deformable dose accumulation. Each daily CBCT dataset was deformed to the planning CT (pCT), dose was computed, and accumulated on the resampled pCT using a parameter-optimized, B-spline algorithm (Elastix, ITK/VTK). EPIC-26 patient reported QOL was prospectively collected pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at 2-, 6-, 12-, 18-, 24-, 36-, 48-, and 60-month follow-ups. Post -RT QOL scores were baseline corrected and standardized to a [0-100] scale using EPIC-26 methodology. Correlations between QOL scores and dosimetric parameters were investigated, and the overall QOL differences between the two groups (QOLMargin-reduced -QOLcontrol ) were calculated.
RESULTS: The median QOL follow-up length for the 20 patients was 48 months. Difference between delivered dose and planned dose did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.1) for both targets and organs at risk between the two groups. At 4 years post-RT, standardized mean QOLMargin-reduced -QOLcontrol were improved for Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Irritative/Obstructive, Bowel, and Sexual EPIC domains by 3.5, 14.8, 10.2, and 16.1, respectively (higher values better). The control group showed larger PTV/rectum and PTV/bladder intersection volumes (7.2 ± 5.8, 18.2 ± 8.1 cc) than the margin-reduced group (2.6 ± 1.8, 12.5 ± 8.3 cc), though the dose to these intersection volumes did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.1) between the groups. PTV/rectum intersection volume showed a moderate correlation (r = -0.56, p < 0.05) to Bowel EPIC domain.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of this prospective study showed that margin-reduced group exhibited clinically meaningful improvement of QOL without compromising the target dose coverage.