Journal of clinical anesthesia · 2018
The effect of methadone on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective, randomized, double blinded, controlled clinical trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Moro Eduardo T, Lambert Miller F, Pereira Ana Luiza, Artioli Thaís, Graicer Giuliana, Bevilacqua Juliana, Bloomstone Joshua
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to assess the quality of recovery from anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) under total intravenous anesthesia, who received either methadone or morphine for post-surgical analgesia by means of questionnaire Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40).
DESIGN: Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.
SETTING: The setting was at an operating room, postoperative recovery area and hospital ward.
PATIENTS: Seventy patients who underwent LC under remifentanil-based anesthesia were randomly assigned to receive methadone 0.1 mg kg-1 or morphine 0.1 mg kg-1.
MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the quality of recovery, using the Quality of Recovery Questionnaire (QoR-40). Secondary outcomes included time to eye opening, the occurrence of nausea and vomiting, pain score, use of supplemental analgesics, and PACU length of stay.
MAIN RESULTS: No differences were observed in the total or individual QoR-40 dimension scores. During the PACU stay, the occurrence of PONV and pain scores were similar between groups. Opioid consumption (p < 0.02) and the level of sedation (p < 0.01) were higher in the morphine group. There were no differences in the amount of time required to achieve PACU discharge criteria. The frequency of nausea or emesis, the severity of pain, and tramadol consumption were comparable between both groups while on the ward.
CONCLUSIONS: Pain scores and the Quality of Recovery did not differ between patients who underwent LC under total intravenous anesthesia, who received either methadone or morphine for post-surgical analgesia.
DESIGN: Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.
SETTING: The setting was at an operating room, postoperative recovery area and hospital ward.
PATIENTS: Seventy patients who underwent LC under remifentanil-based anesthesia were randomly assigned to receive methadone 0.1 mg kg-1 or morphine 0.1 mg kg-1.
MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the quality of recovery, using the Quality of Recovery Questionnaire (QoR-40). Secondary outcomes included time to eye opening, the occurrence of nausea and vomiting, pain score, use of supplemental analgesics, and PACU length of stay.
MAIN RESULTS: No differences were observed in the total or individual QoR-40 dimension scores. During the PACU stay, the occurrence of PONV and pain scores were similar between groups. Opioid consumption (p < 0.02) and the level of sedation (p < 0.01) were higher in the morphine group. There were no differences in the amount of time required to achieve PACU discharge criteria. The frequency of nausea or emesis, the severity of pain, and tramadol consumption were comparable between both groups while on the ward.
CONCLUSIONS: Pain scores and the Quality of Recovery did not differ between patients who underwent LC under total intravenous anesthesia, who received either methadone or morphine for post-surgical analgesia.