MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jns.2020.117215

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the neurological sciences · 2020

Prion diseases reported in the "Annual of the Pathological Autopsy Cases in Japan".

Horimoto Yoshihiko, Sato Chikako, Inagaki Aki, Tajima Toshihisa, Hibino Hiroaki, Kabasawa Hidehiro, Inagaki Hiroshi

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

For surveillance projects to be successful, it is important to accurately diagnose all patients, without overlooking any cases. Here, we investigated the present clinical diagnostic accuracy for prion diseases in Japan.

METHODS

We analyzed volumes of the "Annual of the Pathological Autopsy Cases in Japan", which reported details on 130,105 autopsies conducted from 2007 to 2016 throughout Japan.

RESULTS

The clinical diagnosis of patients with prion disease had a specificity of 91.3% and a sensitivity of 96.3%. The autopsy rates were estimated as 17.8% for patients with clinically suspected prion disease and as 1.8% for the entire population.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the good accuracy of clinical diagnoses of prion diseases, a calculated 78.4 patients with prion disease were expected to have gone undiagnosed during the 10-year study period. However, autopsy is estimated to reveal a maximum of only 13.8 of these clinically undiagnosed patients because of the low autopsy rate. The overall autopsy rate, irrespective of any specific disorder, must increase for effective surveillance projects of disease incidence to be conducted.

Для цитирования: Horimoto Yoshihiko, Sato Chikako, Inagaki Aki, Tajima Toshihisa, Hibino Hiroaki, Kabasawa Hidehiro, Inagaki Hiroshi. Prion diseases reported in the "Annual of the Pathological Autopsy Cases in Japan".. Journal of the neurological sciences. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.117215.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.