Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society · 2021
Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Pulmonary Function Test Abnormalities in Hospitalized Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kawakami Rika, Nakada Yasuki, Hashimoto Yukihiro, Ueda Tomoya, Nakagawa Hitoshi, Nishida Taku, Onoue Kenji, Soeda Tsunenari, Watanabe Makoto, Saito Yoshihiko
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the prevalence and prognostic impact of lung function abnormalities in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
METHODS AND RESULTS: Of the 1,012 consecutive patients who were admitted to Nara Medical University with ADHF between 2011 and 2018, 657 routinely underwent spirometry (pulmonary function test [PFT]) before discharge. Lung function was classified as normal or abnormal (restrictive, obstructive, or mixed). Abnormal PFTs were seen in 63.0% of patients with ADHF (36.7%, 13.1%, and 13.2% for restrictive, obstructive, and mixed, respectively). The prevalence of abnormal PFT increased with age (P<0.001). Overall, abnormal PFT was an independent predictor of the composite endpoint of cardiovascular mortality or hospitalization for HF (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.402; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.039-1.914; P=0.027). Abnormal PFT (adjusted HR 2.294; 95% CI 1.368-4.064; P=0.001), as well as the restrictive (HR 2.299; 95% CI 1.322-4.175; P=0.003) and mixed (HR 2.784; 95% CI 1.399-5.581; P=0.004) patterns, were predictive of the composite endpoint in HFpEF, but not in HFrEF.
CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal PFT was prevalent and associated with poor outcomes in ADHF. Spirometry may be a useful tool in patients with ADHF, especially in those with HFpEF, to identify those at higher risk of a poorer outcome.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Of the 1,012 consecutive patients who were admitted to Nara Medical University with ADHF between 2011 and 2018, 657 routinely underwent spirometry (pulmonary function test [PFT]) before discharge. Lung function was classified as normal or abnormal (restrictive, obstructive, or mixed). Abnormal PFTs were seen in 63.0% of patients with ADHF (36.7%, 13.1%, and 13.2% for restrictive, obstructive, and mixed, respectively). The prevalence of abnormal PFT increased with age (P<0.001). Overall, abnormal PFT was an independent predictor of the composite endpoint of cardiovascular mortality or hospitalization for HF (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.402; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.039-1.914; P=0.027). Abnormal PFT (adjusted HR 2.294; 95% CI 1.368-4.064; P=0.001), as well as the restrictive (HR 2.299; 95% CI 1.322-4.175; P=0.003) and mixed (HR 2.784; 95% CI 1.399-5.581; P=0.004) patterns, were predictive of the composite endpoint in HFpEF, but not in HFrEF.
CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal PFT was prevalent and associated with poor outcomes in ADHF. Spirometry may be a useful tool in patients with ADHF, especially in those with HFpEF, to identify those at higher risk of a poorer outcome.