Journal of athletic training · 2013
Graduated compression stockings for runners: friend, foe, or fake?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bovenschen H Jorn, Booij Mariëlle Te, van der Vleuten Carine J M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of graduated compression stockings (GCS) on lower leg volume and leg complaints in runners during and after exercise.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre and an outdoor running track in Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen Dutch trained recreational runners.
INTERVENTION(S): Participants used a GCS on 1 leg during running.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Lower leg volume of both legs was measured at baseline, directly after running, and at 5 minutes and 30 minutes after running using a validated perometer. (2) Leg complaints were reported on questionnaires at set intervals.
RESULTS: (1) In both experiments, the legs with GCS showed a reduction in mean (± SEM) leg volume directly after running, as compared with the leg without GCS: -14.1 ± 7.6 mL (P = .04) for the 10-km running track and -53.5 ± 17.8 mL (P = .03) for the maximum exercise test. This effect was not observed at 5 and 30 minutes after running. (2) No differences in leg complaints were reported in either experiment.
CONCLUSIONS: The GCS prevented an increase in leg volume just after the running exercise. However, this result was not accompanied by a reduction in subjective questionnaire-reported leg complaints. The practical consequences of the present findings need further study.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre and an outdoor running track in Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen Dutch trained recreational runners.
INTERVENTION(S): Participants used a GCS on 1 leg during running.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Lower leg volume of both legs was measured at baseline, directly after running, and at 5 minutes and 30 minutes after running using a validated perometer. (2) Leg complaints were reported on questionnaires at set intervals.
RESULTS: (1) In both experiments, the legs with GCS showed a reduction in mean (± SEM) leg volume directly after running, as compared with the leg without GCS: -14.1 ± 7.6 mL (P = .04) for the 10-km running track and -53.5 ± 17.8 mL (P = .03) for the maximum exercise test. This effect was not observed at 5 and 30 minutes after running. (2) No differences in leg complaints were reported in either experiment.
CONCLUSIONS: The GCS prevented an increase in leg volume just after the running exercise. However, this result was not accompanied by a reduction in subjective questionnaire-reported leg complaints. The practical consequences of the present findings need further study.