European urology focus · 2025
Single-dose Versus 3-day Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Transurethral Resection or Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate: A Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Trial (CITrUS Trial).
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bausch Kathrin, Speich Benjamin, Vogt Deborah R, Hemkens Lars G, Dreher Maeve, Kwiatkowski Maciej, Subotic Svetozar, Ardelt Peter, Bossard Piet, Hermanns Thomas, Bruni Nicole, Wyler Stephen, Prause Lukas, Merz Sarah-Charlotte, Engesser Christian, Roth Jan, Widmer Andreas F, Seifert Hans-Helge
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Guidelines recommend single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) for transurethral resection (TURP) and photoselective vaporization (PVP) of the prostate. As guideline adherence is low and 3-d AMP is given frequently, we aimed to assess the noninferiority of a single dose compared with 3-d AMP by comparing the incidence of urinary tract infections (UTIs) within 30 d.
METHODS: A double-blind, multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial was conducted comparing single-dose with 3-d AMP in patients assigned to TURP and PVP, assuming a 9% event rate for a clinical diagnosis of a UTI with a 4.4% noninferiority margin.
KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: From anticipated 1574 patients, 728 were recruited and 621 randomized patients were analyzed fully. The study was preliminary stopped due to delayed recruitment and was analyzed exploratively. Following single-dose AMP, 11.0% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.9%, 15.0%; 33/300) had a clinical diagnosis of UTIs, compared with 8.5% (95% CI 5.8%, 12.1%; 26/307) receiving 3-d AMP (between-group difference 2.5% [95% CI -2.2%, 7.5%]). The rates of UTIs supported by bacteriuria were lower without any difference between groups (single-dose AMP: 3.3% [95% CI 1.8%, 6.0%]; 3-d AMP: 3.3% [95% CI 1.8%, 5.9%]; between-group difference 0.08% [95% CI -2.97%, 3.16%]). Adverse events were rare.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In this randomized trial of transurethral prostate surgery patients, 11.0% of those on single-dose AMP and 8.5% on 3-d AMP were diagnosed with UTIs. The smaller than planned sample size precludes a definite interpretation favoring either group. Diagnoses of UTIs based on symptoms and bacteriuria reduced the overall rates and group differences.
METHODS: A double-blind, multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial was conducted comparing single-dose with 3-d AMP in patients assigned to TURP and PVP, assuming a 9% event rate for a clinical diagnosis of a UTI with a 4.4% noninferiority margin.
KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: From anticipated 1574 patients, 728 were recruited and 621 randomized patients were analyzed fully. The study was preliminary stopped due to delayed recruitment and was analyzed exploratively. Following single-dose AMP, 11.0% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.9%, 15.0%; 33/300) had a clinical diagnosis of UTIs, compared with 8.5% (95% CI 5.8%, 12.1%; 26/307) receiving 3-d AMP (between-group difference 2.5% [95% CI -2.2%, 7.5%]). The rates of UTIs supported by bacteriuria were lower without any difference between groups (single-dose AMP: 3.3% [95% CI 1.8%, 6.0%]; 3-d AMP: 3.3% [95% CI 1.8%, 5.9%]; between-group difference 0.08% [95% CI -2.97%, 3.16%]). Adverse events were rare.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In this randomized trial of transurethral prostate surgery patients, 11.0% of those on single-dose AMP and 8.5% on 3-d AMP were diagnosed with UTIs. The smaller than planned sample size precludes a definite interpretation favoring either group. Diagnoses of UTIs based on symptoms and bacteriuria reduced the overall rates and group differences.