The Journal of arthroplasty · 2011
Pulmonary embolism prophylaxis in more than 30,000 total knee arthroplasty patients: is there a best choice?
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Khatod Monti, Inacio Maria C S, Bini Stefano A, Paxton Elizabeth W
Аннотация
Prophylaxis for pulmonary embolism (PE) prevention in total knee arthroplasty remains controversial. A joint registry evaluated venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and anesthesia impact on the incidence of PE, fatal PE, and death. Patients received mechanical prophylaxis alone or chemical with or without mechanical prophylaxis. The overall PE incidence was 0.45%; fatal PE, 0.01%; and death, 0.31%. The only significant difference in any outcome was the incidence of PE between Coumadin and mechanical prophylaxis alone. Variables associated with a higher incidence of PE were age, an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3 or higher, and the use of general anesthesia. Based on the findings, general anesthesia can be discouraged, and only Coumadin fared better than mechanical prophylaxis alone, whereas other forms of chemical prophylaxis revealed no significant differences.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeAspirinCaliforniaCohort StudiesFemaleHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotion Therapy, Continuous PassiveMultivariate AnalysisPrevalenceProspective StudiesPulmonary EmbolismRegistriesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWarfarinYoung Adult