MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fonc.2025.1445485

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in oncology · 2025

Comparison of efficacy and safety of thrombus prevention strategies after abdominal and pelvic cancer surgery: Bayesian network based meta-analysis.

Qin Shiran, Guo Sitong, Yao Yucheng, He Ying, Xu Dandan, Su Henghai, Chen Xiaoyu, Meng Haoru

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after abdominal and pelvic cancer surgery increases the risk of mortality and disability. However, there is insufficient evidence supporting the choice of anticoagulation strategies.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials from inception to January 2024. Studies concerning thrombosis prevention after abdominal and pelvic surgery were included. Network meta-analysis(NMA) and direct meta-analysis (DMA) methods were employed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various prophylactic strategies.

RESULTS

Twenty clinical trials involving a total of 4923 patients were included. The DMA results showed that low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) was more effective in preventing VTE compared to no treatment (OR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.21 to 3.19), and LMWH plus physiotherapy was more effective than LMWH (OR = 10.95; 95% CI: 1.33 to 90.40). The NMA results indicated that DOACs (OR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.76) and LMWH (OR = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.32 to 0.77) were significantly effective in preventing venous thrombosis compared with no treatment. The cumulative ranking probability curve (SUCRA) showed that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were the best intervention. In terms of major bleeding, unfractionated heparin (UFH) had a higher risk than LMWH, physiotherapy, and no treatment, with statistically significant differences. The SUCRA analysis indicated that physiotherapy was the best intervention for major bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Existing evidence suggests that DOACs can provide better thromboprophylaxis efficacy for patients after abdominal and pelvic cancer surgery, achieving an optimal balance between efficacy and safety. LMWH has become an intervention with efficacy second only to DOACs, with similar safety.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ , identifier CRD42024513090.

Для цитирования: Qin Shiran, Guo Sitong, Yao Yucheng, He Ying, Xu Dandan, Su Henghai, Chen Xiaoyu, Meng Haoru. Comparison of efficacy and safety of thrombus prevention strategies after abdominal and pelvic cancer surgery: Bayesian network based meta-analysis.. Frontiers in oncology. 2025. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1445485.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.