World journal of clinical cases · 2023
Cecal duplication cyst in an infant presenting as shock: A case report.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kim Seung Mo, Lee Sun Hyang, Park Ga Young, Kim Sung Shin, Lee Cheol Gu, Jin Soo Ji
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although intestinal obstruction is one of the most common surgical emergencies in an infant, it is difficult to diagnose neonatal enteric duplication cysts (EDC) preoperatively owing to their rarity as a cause of intestinal obstruction. We describe a case report of a neonatal EDC presenting intestinal obstruction and shock.
CASE SUMMARY: A 32-d-old male infant with a prenatal sonographic finding of bladder distension was admitted to our hospital for a severely distended abdomen, fever, and oliguria. The first diagnostic hypothesis was septic shock and intestinal obstruction. The patient's symptoms worsened; following an emergency surgical exploratory laparotomy and histopathological findings, the final diagnosis of cecal duplication cyst was confirmed. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful, and on the fifth postoperative day, oral feeding restarted. Twenty days later, the patient was discharged from the hospital.
CONCLUSION: Although EDC located in the cecum is exceptional, it should be considered when evaluating suspected intestinal obstruction and shock.
CASE SUMMARY: A 32-d-old male infant with a prenatal sonographic finding of bladder distension was admitted to our hospital for a severely distended abdomen, fever, and oliguria. The first diagnostic hypothesis was septic shock and intestinal obstruction. The patient's symptoms worsened; following an emergency surgical exploratory laparotomy and histopathological findings, the final diagnosis of cecal duplication cyst was confirmed. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful, and on the fifth postoperative day, oral feeding restarted. Twenty days later, the patient was discharged from the hospital.
CONCLUSION: Although EDC located in the cecum is exceptional, it should be considered when evaluating suspected intestinal obstruction and shock.