European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2015
Measurement of preoperative lobar lung function with computed tomography ventilation imaging: progress towards rapid stratification of lung cancer lobectomy patients with abnormal lung function.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Eslick Enid M, Bailey Dale L, Harris Benjamin, Kipritidis John, Stevens Mark, Li Bob T, Bailey Elizabeth, Gradinscak Denis, Pollock Sean, Htun Chris, Turner Robin, Eade Thomas, Aslani Ali, Snowdon Graeme, Keall Paul J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: In lung cancer preoperative evaluation, functional lung imaging is commonly used to assess lobar function. Computed tomography ventilation (CT-V) imaging is an emerging lung function imaging modality. We compared CT-V imaging assessment of lobar function and its prediction of postoperative lung function to that achieved by (i) positron emission tomography ventilation (PET-V) imaging and (ii) the standard anatomical segment counting (ASC) method. We hypothesized (i) that CT-V and PET-V have similar relative lobar function and (ii) that functional imaging and anatomic assessment (ASC) yield different predicted postoperative (ppo) lung function and therefore could change clinical management.
METHODS: In this proof-of-concept study, 11 patients were subjected to pulmonary function tests, CT-V and PET-V imaging. The Bland-Altman plot, Pearson's correlation and linear regression analysis were used to assess the agreement between the CT-V-, PET-V- and ASC-based quantification of lobar function and in the ppo lung function.
RESULTS: CT-V and PET-V imaging demonstrated strong correlations in quantifying relative lobar function (r = 0.96; P < 0.001). A Wilcoxon-signed rank test showed no significant difference in the lobar function estimates between the two imaging modalities (P = 0.83). The Bland-Altman plot also showed no significant differences. The correlation between ASC-based lobar function estimates with ventilation imaging was low, r < 0.45; however, the predictions of postoperative lung function correlated strongly between all three methods.
CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of lobar function from CT-V imaging correlated strongly with PET-V imaging, but had low correlations with ASC. CT-V imaging may be a useful alternative method in preoperative evaluation for lung cancer patients.
METHODS: In this proof-of-concept study, 11 patients were subjected to pulmonary function tests, CT-V and PET-V imaging. The Bland-Altman plot, Pearson's correlation and linear regression analysis were used to assess the agreement between the CT-V-, PET-V- and ASC-based quantification of lobar function and in the ppo lung function.
RESULTS: CT-V and PET-V imaging demonstrated strong correlations in quantifying relative lobar function (r = 0.96; P < 0.001). A Wilcoxon-signed rank test showed no significant difference in the lobar function estimates between the two imaging modalities (P = 0.83). The Bland-Altman plot also showed no significant differences. The correlation between ASC-based lobar function estimates with ventilation imaging was low, r < 0.45; however, the predictions of postoperative lung function correlated strongly between all three methods.
CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of lobar function from CT-V imaging correlated strongly with PET-V imaging, but had low correlations with ASC. CT-V imaging may be a useful alternative method in preoperative evaluation for lung cancer patients.