European journal of haematology · 2021
TRough versus AUC Monitoring of cyclosporine: A randomized comparison of adverse drug reactions in adult allogeneic stem cell recipients (TRAM study).
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kuijvenhoven Marianne A, Wilhelm Abraham J, Meijer Ellen, Janssen Jeroen J W M, Swart Eleonora L
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence and severity of adverse drug reactions of cyclosporine using AUC-targeted therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) compared to trough level (Ctrough )-targeted TDM in adult allogeneic stem cell recipients.
METHODS: Blind, monocenter, intervention study. Subjects were 1:1 randomized into either an AUC group or a Ctrough group. Adverse drug reactions were accessed two and four weeks after start of treatment.
RESULTS: Forty patients were included, resulting in 15 evaluable subjects (AUC group) and 13 evaluable subjects (Ctrough group). Grade two/three toxicity was observed in 46% (Ctrough group) versus 60% of subjects (AUC group) (P = .463). There was no significant difference between two and four weeks after start of cyclosporine for nausea (P = .142 resp. P = .122), renal dysfunction (P = .464 resp. P = 1.000), and hypomagnesemia (P = 1.000 resp. P = .411). Subjects in the AUC group reached the therapeutic goal earlier (72,7% versus 43,0% at third sampling point, P = .332) and were within the target range more consistently.
CONCLUSION: This study showed no reduction in incidence and severity of cyclosporine-induced toxicity with AUC- versus trough level-targeted TDM. Although modeled dosing based on AUC led to faster optimal target attainment, this did not result in less toxicity in the early days after transplantation.
METHODS: Blind, monocenter, intervention study. Subjects were 1:1 randomized into either an AUC group or a Ctrough group. Adverse drug reactions were accessed two and four weeks after start of treatment.
RESULTS: Forty patients were included, resulting in 15 evaluable subjects (AUC group) and 13 evaluable subjects (Ctrough group). Grade two/three toxicity was observed in 46% (Ctrough group) versus 60% of subjects (AUC group) (P = .463). There was no significant difference between two and four weeks after start of cyclosporine for nausea (P = .142 resp. P = .122), renal dysfunction (P = .464 resp. P = 1.000), and hypomagnesemia (P = 1.000 resp. P = .411). Subjects in the AUC group reached the therapeutic goal earlier (72,7% versus 43,0% at third sampling point, P = .332) and were within the target range more consistently.
CONCLUSION: This study showed no reduction in incidence and severity of cyclosporine-induced toxicity with AUC- versus trough level-targeted TDM. Although modeled dosing based on AUC led to faster optimal target attainment, this did not result in less toxicity in the early days after transplantation.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultArea Under CurveCyclosporineDrug MonitoringFemaleGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteLymphomaMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaNauseaROC CurveRandom AllocationRenal Tubular Transport, Inborn ErrorsTransplantation, Homologous