MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2106/jbjs.k.00593

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume · 2012

Risk factors for periprosthetic ankle joint infection: a case-control study.

Kessler Bernhard, Sendi Parham, Graber Peter, Knupp Markus, Zwicky Lukas, Hintermann Beat, Zimmerli Werner

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic ankle joint infection is a feared complication of total ankle arthroplasty because the implant fails in the majority of cases. However, risk factors for developing these infections are unknown.

METHODS

We aimed to determine risk factors for infection in a matched case-control study that included twenty-six patients with periprosthetic ankle joint infection and two control groups, each consisting of fifty-two patients.

RESULTS

The prevalence of periprosthetic ankle joint infection within our cohort was 4.7%. Four infections (15%) had a hematogenous origin and twenty-two (85%), an exogenous origin. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen, followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci. Preoperative predisposing factors associated with infection included prior surgery at the site of infection (odds ratio [OR] = 4.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.98 to 21.35, and OR = 4.78, 95% CI = 1.53 to 14.91, in comparison with the two control groups) and a low American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score (35.8 versus 49.8 and 47.6 in the two control groups, p ≤ 0.02). The mean duration of the index surgery was significantly longer in the case group than in both control groups (119 versus eighty-four and ninety-three minutes, p ≤ 0.02). After surgery, persistent wound dehiscence (OR = 15.38, 95% CI = 2.91 to 81.34, p = 0.01, in comparison with both control groups) and secondary wound drainage (OR = 7.00, 95% CI = 1.45 to 33.70, and OR = 5.31, 95% CI = 1.01 to 26.78, in comparison with the two control groups, p ≤ 0.04) were associated with the development of a periprosthetic ankle joint infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients at risk for periprosthetic ankle joint infection following total ankle arthroplasty include those with a history of surgery on the ankle, a low preoperative AOFAS hindfoot score, and a long operative time. Postoperatively, patients with a prolonged wound dehiscence or a secondary wound-healing problem are also at risk for infection.

Для цитирования: Kessler Bernhard, Sendi Parham, Graber Peter, Knupp Markus, Zwicky Lukas, Hintermann Beat, Zimmerli Werner. Risk factors for periprosthetic ankle joint infection: a case-control study.. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume. 2012. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.k.00593.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.