Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025
Brachytherapy monotherapy for favorable and select unfavorable intermediate risk prostate cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
King Martin, Mirić Grgur, Galbreath Robert, Fiano Ryan, Moningi Shalini, Wallner Kent, Orio Peter
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines define brachytherapy monotherapy as a suitable treatment for favorable intermediate risk (FIR) and unfavorable intermediate risk (UIR) prostate cancer. Our objective is to define the subgroup of patients suitable for brachytherapy monotherapy.
METHODS: We conducted a single-institutional retrospective analysis of intermediate risk prostate cancer, treated with brachytherapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and/or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). The primary endpoint was biochemical failure (BF), defined as prostate specific antigen (PSA) > 0.4 ng/mL. For monotherapy, multivariate Fine-Gray analysis was used to identify risk factors associated with BF. Univariate analysis was performed to evaluate whether ADT and/or EBRT were associated with BF for patients without and with such factors.
RESULTS: Among 1622 patients, the median follow-up was 10.4 years. For monotherapy, PSA ≥ 10 ng/mL (adjusted sHR 3.01; 95% CI: 1.10-8.27; p = 0.032) and cT2b-c disease (adjusted sHR 4.52; 95% CI: 1.85-11.07; p = 0.001) were associated with BF. The 10-year incidences of BF after monotherapy for patients without and with these risk factors were 5.8% (3.8% FIR, 8.8% UIR) versus 17.2% (9.3% FIR, 23.9% UIR), respectively. For the cT1-T2a/PSA < 10 risk group, neither the addition of ADT (sHR 0.90; 95% CI: 0.38-2.1; p = 0.82) nor EBRT (sHR 0.65; 95% CI: 0.36-1.18; p = 0.16) was associated with biochemical failure. For the cT2b-T2c and/or PSA ≥ 10 subgroup, ADT (sHR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.14-0.74; p = 0.007) but not EBRT (sHR 0.66; 95% CI: 0.34-1.31; p = 0.24) was associated with BF.
CONCLUSIONS: Brachytherapy monotherapy is suitable for all FIR, and UIR disease meeting cT1-T2a/PSA < 10 criteria.
METHODS: We conducted a single-institutional retrospective analysis of intermediate risk prostate cancer, treated with brachytherapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and/or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). The primary endpoint was biochemical failure (BF), defined as prostate specific antigen (PSA) > 0.4 ng/mL. For monotherapy, multivariate Fine-Gray analysis was used to identify risk factors associated with BF. Univariate analysis was performed to evaluate whether ADT and/or EBRT were associated with BF for patients without and with such factors.
RESULTS: Among 1622 patients, the median follow-up was 10.4 years. For monotherapy, PSA ≥ 10 ng/mL (adjusted sHR 3.01; 95% CI: 1.10-8.27; p = 0.032) and cT2b-c disease (adjusted sHR 4.52; 95% CI: 1.85-11.07; p = 0.001) were associated with BF. The 10-year incidences of BF after monotherapy for patients without and with these risk factors were 5.8% (3.8% FIR, 8.8% UIR) versus 17.2% (9.3% FIR, 23.9% UIR), respectively. For the cT1-T2a/PSA < 10 risk group, neither the addition of ADT (sHR 0.90; 95% CI: 0.38-2.1; p = 0.82) nor EBRT (sHR 0.65; 95% CI: 0.36-1.18; p = 0.16) was associated with biochemical failure. For the cT2b-T2c and/or PSA ≥ 10 subgroup, ADT (sHR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.14-0.74; p = 0.007) but not EBRT (sHR 0.66; 95% CI: 0.34-1.31; p = 0.24) was associated with BF.
CONCLUSIONS: Brachytherapy monotherapy is suitable for all FIR, and UIR disease meeting cT1-T2a/PSA < 10 criteria.