Predicting survival rates of critically ill septic patients with heart failure using interpretable machine learning models.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Septic patients with heart failure (HF) have higher mortality and poorer prognosis than patients with either disease alone. Currently, no tool exists for predicting survival rate in such patients.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to develop an interpretable prediction model to predict survival rate for septic patients with HF.
METHODS
Severe septic patients with HF were recruited from the MIMIC-IV database (as training and internal validation cohorts) as well as from the MIMIC-III database (as external validation cohorts). Four models including Deep Learning Survival (DeepSurv) were constructed and evaluated. Furthermore, Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method was employed to explain the DeepSurv model.
RESULTS
A total of 11,778 patients were included and 22 features were identified to construct the models. Among the 4 models, the DeepSurv model had the highest area under the curve (AUC) values with an AUC of 0.851 (internal) and 0.801 (external) and C-index of 0.8329 (internal) and 0.7816 (external). The mean cumulative/dynamic AUC values exceeded 0.85 in both internal and external validations. The Integrated Brier Score values were well below 0.25, at 0.068 and 0.093, respectively. Furthermore, the Decision Curve Analysis showed that the DeepSurv model achieved favorable net benefit. The SHAP method further confirmed the reliability of the DeepSurv model.
CONCLUSION
Our DeepSurv model was the most comprehensive interpretable prediction model specifically developed and validated for septic critically ill patients with HF. It demonstrated good model performance in predicting the 28-day survival rate of such patients and will provide valuable decision support for clinicians.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.