Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice · 2026
Temporomandibular disorders: A century-old history of the battle between controversy and denialism.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Greene Charles S, Türp Jens C
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) have been the subject to controversy for over a century, with early theories focusing on anatomical structures and their relationships.
OBJECTIVE: The paper aims to examine the historical evolution of TMD concepts and the transition from mechanistic to biopsychosocial models, exploring the impact on diagnosis and therapy.
RESULTS: Studies have either disproven or failed to support the early mechanistic models, thus leading to the establishment of the current evidence-based approach. The advent of postgraduate programs in orofacial pain and clinical practice guidelines has contributed to the standardization of TMD training on a global scale.
DISCUSSION: Despite the compelling evidence supporting the modern model, some practitioners continue to resist these changes. The authors argue that this resistance can be construed as a denial of the well-established scientific findings that have emerged in this field.
CONCLUSION: TMD diagnosis and management undergone significant advancements; however, ongoing research is imperative. The authors advocate for the broader acceptance of the evidence-based biopsychosocial model to ensure ongoing progress in the field.
OBJECTIVE: The paper aims to examine the historical evolution of TMD concepts and the transition from mechanistic to biopsychosocial models, exploring the impact on diagnosis and therapy.
RESULTS: Studies have either disproven or failed to support the early mechanistic models, thus leading to the establishment of the current evidence-based approach. The advent of postgraduate programs in orofacial pain and clinical practice guidelines has contributed to the standardization of TMD training on a global scale.
DISCUSSION: Despite the compelling evidence supporting the modern model, some practitioners continue to resist these changes. The authors argue that this resistance can be construed as a denial of the well-established scientific findings that have emerged in this field.
CONCLUSION: TMD diagnosis and management undergone significant advancements; however, ongoing research is imperative. The authors advocate for the broader acceptance of the evidence-based biopsychosocial model to ensure ongoing progress in the field.