International journal of cardiology · 2009
Relationship of plasma erythropoietin to long-term outcome in acute coronary syndrome.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Szummer Karolina, Lindahl Bertil, Sylvén Christer, Jernberg Tomas
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Erythropoietin has been related to adverse prognosis in patients with heart failure, but it is unknown whether it adds prognostic information in acute coronary syndrome.
METHODS: Plasma erythropoietin was measured on admission with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 627 patients. Patients were divided into three groups depending on their erythropoietin level and followed for myocardial infarction (MI) (median 6 months) and mortality (median 39 months). Cox regression models were used to evaluate erythropoietin compared to clinical variables; age, gender, diabetes, smoking, prior MI, heart failure, hypertension and revascularization. In a second Cox regression model, laboratory markers were assessed; hemoglobin, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), C-reactive protein (CRP), cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and N-terminal pro-brain-natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP).
RESULTS: Patients with the highest erythropoietin level (>8.8 mU/mL, n=205) had a 47% increased mortality (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.04-2.06, p=0.028) when adjusted for clinical variables. Compared to laboratory risk markers, erythropoietin added prognostic information (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.05-2.38, p=0.027) when adjusted for hemoglobin, eGFR and CRP. Erythropoietin (HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.79-1.86, p=0.387) was no longer significantly associated with mortality when cTnT and NT-proBNP were added. Erythropoietin was not related to the risk of future MI (HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.65-2.33, p=0.513).
CONCLUSION: Elevated erythropoietin level was associated with increased mortality in patients admitted with possible ACS when adjusted for clinical variables, or for kidney function and hemoglobin. However, erythropoietin does not add prognostic information when markers of myocardial necrosis and dysfunction are available in ACS.
METHODS: Plasma erythropoietin was measured on admission with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 627 patients. Patients were divided into three groups depending on their erythropoietin level and followed for myocardial infarction (MI) (median 6 months) and mortality (median 39 months). Cox regression models were used to evaluate erythropoietin compared to clinical variables; age, gender, diabetes, smoking, prior MI, heart failure, hypertension and revascularization. In a second Cox regression model, laboratory markers were assessed; hemoglobin, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), C-reactive protein (CRP), cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and N-terminal pro-brain-natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP).
RESULTS: Patients with the highest erythropoietin level (>8.8 mU/mL, n=205) had a 47% increased mortality (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.04-2.06, p=0.028) when adjusted for clinical variables. Compared to laboratory risk markers, erythropoietin added prognostic information (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.05-2.38, p=0.027) when adjusted for hemoglobin, eGFR and CRP. Erythropoietin (HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.79-1.86, p=0.387) was no longer significantly associated with mortality when cTnT and NT-proBNP were added. Erythropoietin was not related to the risk of future MI (HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.65-2.33, p=0.513).
CONCLUSION: Elevated erythropoietin level was associated with increased mortality in patients admitted with possible ACS when adjusted for clinical variables, or for kidney function and hemoglobin. However, erythropoietin does not add prognostic information when markers of myocardial necrosis and dysfunction are available in ACS.