The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2016
Effect of dialysis on fetal heart rate: is inpatient admission for fetal monitoring necessary?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Loichinger Matthew H, Broady Autumn J, Yamasato Kelly, Mills Emily, McLemore P Gordon, Towner Dena
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Pregnant patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) have long hospital stays for the purpose of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) during HD, which allows for monitoring of fetal well-being. However, more frequent dialysis allows for smaller fluid shifts, preventing maternal hypotension. Our aim was to determine differences in rates of EFM abnormalities during HD versus non-stress testing (NST) off dialysis for gravid women with renal failure.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study over a 13-year period (2000-2013) identified five patients with renal failure in pregnancy. EFM tracings were reviewed during HD (cases) and routine inpatient NST off HD (controls). Standardized nomenclature was used to identify EFM abnormalities. The rate of abnormalities per hour of EFM was calculated. Kruskal-Wallis test was used and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in late decelerations (p = 0.2) between cases and controls. Significantly fewer variable decelerations (p = 0.01) and contractions (p ≤0.001) were noted during dialysis compared to controls. Significantly more prolonged decelerations (p = 0.02) were noted during HD compared to controls.
CONCLUSION: There may be no fetal benefit of EFM during HD for gravid women with renal disease attributed to hypertensive and diabetic nephropathy. There may be cost savings by shifting HD to the outpatient setting.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study over a 13-year period (2000-2013) identified five patients with renal failure in pregnancy. EFM tracings were reviewed during HD (cases) and routine inpatient NST off HD (controls). Standardized nomenclature was used to identify EFM abnormalities. The rate of abnormalities per hour of EFM was calculated. Kruskal-Wallis test was used and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in late decelerations (p = 0.2) between cases and controls. Significantly fewer variable decelerations (p = 0.01) and contractions (p ≤0.001) were noted during dialysis compared to controls. Significantly more prolonged decelerations (p = 0.02) were noted during HD compared to controls.
CONCLUSION: There may be no fetal benefit of EFM during HD for gravid women with renal disease attributed to hypertensive and diabetic nephropathy. There may be cost savings by shifting HD to the outpatient setting.