Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2000
Two prenatal alcohol use screening instruments compared with a physiologic measure.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Budd K W, Ross-Alaolmolki K, Zeller R A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare two prenatal alcohol use screening instruments with a physiologic measure of prenatal alcohol use.
DESIGN: Retrospective comparison of the Prenatal Alcohol Use Interview (PAUI) and the ACOG Antepartum Record with CDTect.
SETTING: An inner-city, high-volume, prenatal clinic.
PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-six women selected and enrolled at their first prenatal visits.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: An assessment of relative sensitivity and specificity of two prenatal alcohol use screening instruments.
RESULTS: Women identified as Drinkers by the CDTect were more likely to be identified as Drinkers by the PAUI (59%) than by the ACOG Antepartum Record (19%). Also, the PAUI had a lower false negative rate (41%) than the ACOG record (80%). That is, the PAUI was less likely to identify as Quitters women the CDTect identified as Drinkers than was the ACOG record.
CONCLUSION: The PAUI is a more sensitive screen than the ACOG record and should be the instrument preferred for screening prenatal alcohol use.
DESIGN: Retrospective comparison of the Prenatal Alcohol Use Interview (PAUI) and the ACOG Antepartum Record with CDTect.
SETTING: An inner-city, high-volume, prenatal clinic.
PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-six women selected and enrolled at their first prenatal visits.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: An assessment of relative sensitivity and specificity of two prenatal alcohol use screening instruments.
RESULTS: Women identified as Drinkers by the CDTect were more likely to be identified as Drinkers by the PAUI (59%) than by the ACOG Antepartum Record (19%). Also, the PAUI had a lower false negative rate (41%) than the ACOG record (80%). That is, the PAUI was less likely to identify as Quitters women the CDTect identified as Drinkers than was the ACOG record.
CONCLUSION: The PAUI is a more sensitive screen than the ACOG record and should be the instrument preferred for screening prenatal alcohol use.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAlcohol DrinkingAmbulatory Care FacilitiesData CollectionFemaleFetal Alcohol Spectrum DisordersHumansInfant, NewbornInterviews as TopicMass ScreeningMedical RecordsMiddle AgedNeonatal NursingPhysical ExaminationPregnancyPrenatal CareReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSampling StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySurveys and QuestionnairesTransferrinUnited StatesUrban Population