1. Muscle Cachexia
Muscle cachexia is one of the most common and severe symptoms of advanced cancer, often observed in the course of upper gastrointestinal tract cancers (especially pancreatic, stomach, and esophageal cancers), head and neck cancers, lung cancer, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas [ 1 , 2 ]. As defined by the Cachexia Consensus Conference in 2008, cachexia is “metabolic syndrome associated with the underlying disease and characterized by muscle loss with or without fat loss.” The complex molecular mechanisms underlying the gradual reduction of body tissue mass have not been fully understood. Cancer cachexia is also often referred to as cachexia–anorexia syndrome. Anorexia in cancer patients is associated with the predominance of signals suppressing appetite in the hypothalamus—proopiomelanocortin and anorexigenic action of pro-inflammatory cytokines: IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α. Additionally, the effect is exacerbated by significant metabolic changes, such as energy expenditure at rest and disturbed metabolism of carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids [ 3 ]. However, the mechanisms of losing muscle mass in cancer cachexia have a different background than starvation. Oncological patients have reduced body weight due to the gradual decrease in muscle and fat mass, while non-muscle proteins are preserved [ 3 ]. Several studies showed that depending on the type of cancer, loss of muscle mass affects 30 to 80% of patients and is responsible for a drastic reduction in quality of life, as well as reducing the effectiveness of chemotherapy, often being the direct cause of death [ 4 , 5 ]. Among factors causing cachexia, the leading role is attributed to substances with cachectic activity produced by cancer cells and the immune system, mainly cytokines, including the vital IL-6 and others, such as TNF-α, IL-1, IFN-γ, lipolysis activating factor (LMF), and proteolysis inducing factor (PIF) [ 6 , 7 ]. Furthermore, skeletal muscle proteins’ degradation processes via lysosomal pathways and ubiquitin–proteasome systems play an essential role in muscle atrophy and are overactive in over 50% of cancer patients [ 8 ]. Rapidly progressive cancer cachexia syndrome leads to multi-directional changes, affecting all aspect of patients’ wellness, including anemia, nutritional deficiencies, loss of muscle mass and activity limitation, impairment of internal organs and immune system function, changes in external appearance, depression, weakening social bonds, deterioration of quality of life and, as a consequence, faster death of the patient [ 9 ]. Because weight loss is an important prognostic factor in cancer patients, the inability to stop cancer progression of cancer cachexia is often a critical, ultimately determining factor in terminating chemotherapy treatment due to the organism’s poor condition.
While significant development of molecular biology, treatment strategies, and novel drugs dedicated to treating several oncological diseases has been introduced, unfortunately, there is still no significant progress in pancreatic cancer therapy, in almost all cases, associated with muscle cachexia. Moreover, muscular cachexia is still wholly deprived of the possibility of pharmacological intervention, and the only recommendation for the patient is to use a high-protein diet. Implementing an appropriate diet is very often difficult to achieve since one of the paraneoplastic syndromes is appetite suppression [ 10 ]. Thus, the consumption of recommended high amounts of protein through the diet itself, which could support maintaining muscle mass, is impossible for most patients. In advanced cases, enteral nutrition has to be implemented. Hitherto, new drug candidate clinical trials have been associated with the administration of progesterone derivatives—medroxyprogesterone [ 4 ], megestrol acetate [ 11 ], ghrelin [ 12 ], and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol [ 13 ]—as appetite stimulators and weight loss limiting agents, as well as corticosteroids, erythropoietin, and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors as muscle tissue metabolism modulators [ 14 , 15 ]. Unfortunately, stimulation of the hunger and satiety center and increased food intake are insufficient to compensate catabolic processes intensified in cancer cachexia and cannot reconstruct or even inhibit muscle mass loss [ 16 ]. In turn, a long-term treatment using anabolic hormones is not possible due to the strong immunosuppressive effects, limiting anticancer therapy effectiveness. Recent clinical trials in cachexia therapy are also quite limited and are mainly focused on dietary supplements limiting oxidative damage and protein loss in the skeletal muscles. A summary of clinical trials targeting cachexia is shown in Table 1 .
2. STAT3 Protein
It seems that the search for effective treatment and new drug candidates requires the knowledge of the exact molecular mechanisms that determine the development of cachexia–anorexia syndrome, with particular emphasis on the role of endogenous factors produced by proliferating cancer cells. Targeting molecular pathways involved in oncogenesis, whose excessive activity is responsible for skeletal muscle degradation, is a promising strategy. A great example of such an approach is JAK/STAT signaling pathway inhibition, which, on the one hand, could stop the expansion of certain types of tumors and, on the other, has a potentially protective effect on skeletal muscles. Among cellular proteins, particular emphasis should be put on the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), which drives cancer progression and is also crucial in muscle cachexia.
3. STAT3 Protein in Oncogenesis
Constitutive activation of STAT3 leading to cancer is the result of increased cytokine production (IL-6, IL-10), continuous cytokine receptor activation (VEGFR/EGFR), or non-receptor tyrosine kinases (JAKs, Src, Abl) [ 17 ]. Activation of JAK, MAPK, or mTOR kinase results in phosphorylation of tyrosine or serine residues in the C-terminal domain of the STAT3 protein and its dimerization. The active STAT3 dimer moves to the cell nucleus to initiate transcription of target genes [ 18 ]. In tumor cells, STAT3 is constitutively active. Constitutive activation of STAT3 has been described in hematopoietic disorders such as myeloma, Hodgkin lymphoma, anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALK), angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma, adult T cell lymphoma/leukemia, and mantle lymphoma [ 19 , 20 ].
Moreover, continuous cytokine-mediated STAT3 stimulation has been reported in many cases of solid tumors—head and neck cancer, melanoma, prostate, breast, colon, and gliomas [ 20 , 21 ]. In cancer cells, constitutive activation of STAT3 is necessary for promoting the overexpression of genes that encode anti-apoptotic proteins and that are regulators of cell cycle and angiogenic factors [ 22 ]. Strong STAT3 expression in cancer cells results from the loss of inhibitory signals and the predominance of factors causing its continuous activation. The result of STAT3 activity is the accumulation of IL-6/JAKs, EGRF, Src, transcription factors, and oncoproteins, induced by inhibition or deletion of negative regulatory proteins or over-stimulation of intracellular and extracellular factors [ 23 ]. Due to the various stimuli mentioned above regarding STAT3 overexpression, universal upstream-targeted therapy is not possible. Similar sustained STAT3 activity may be determined by the inactivation of STAT3 suppressors such as SOCS (suppressor of cytokine signaling) and PIAS (protein inhibitor of activated STATs). Protein tyrosine phosphatases may also cause similar results as activation of upstream STAT3 signaling pathways [ 24 ]. Increased activation of STAT3 in cancer cells results in its continuous presence in the cell nucleus and gene expression disorder. Many studies indicate that STAT3 participates in regulating critical processes for the development and progression of cancer. It plays a role in cell survival, proliferation, angiogenesis, metastasis, and cell protection against the body’s immune response [ 21 ] ( Figure 1 ).
4. STAT3 Protein in Skeletal Muscle
Skeletal muscles are considered one of the most malleable body tissues, whose functioning, mass, and metabolism are shaped by both endo- and exogenous stimuli, guaranteeing a balance between anabolic and catabolic processes, and thus muscle homeostasis. In the skeletal muscle cells, the basic range of STAT3 activity is necessary to develop skeletal muscle satellite cells properly. In vitro studies on the knock-out of the gene encoding the STAT3 protein reduces the expression of muscle differentiation’s primary markers, such as MyoD and myogenin [ 27 ]. Similar observations are provided by in vivo studies in which STAT3 deletion causes impairment of post-traumatic muscle regeneration [ 27 ]. In contrast, transient use of the STAT3 inhibitor in mice accelerates the repair process of injured muscle tissue [ 27 ]. In vivo studies have also shown that in muscle injury, STAT3 is responsible for the renewal of satellite cells [ 28 ].
On the other hand, in vivo studies on conventional STAT3 knockout mice indicates early embryonic lethality at E6.5 to E7.5 levels, resulting in rapid embryo degeneration between E6.5 and E7.5 without apparent mesoderm formation [ 29 ]. STAT3 ablation results in embryonic death less than one day before embryo development in functional cardiomyocytes at E7.5 to E8.5 [ 29 ]. It seems likely that STAT3 is located in the embryo at the cardiac field formation site, suggesting STAT3 contribution to cardiomyogenesis. The role of STAT3 in embryogenesis remains unelucidated because STAT3 knockout is fatal to embryos by inhibiting cardiomyocyte formation [ 29 ]. The above reports illustrate many faces of STAT3, the presence of which seems to be of crucial importance for muscle cells.
STAT3 is the most crucial element of the interleukin 6 (IL-6) and JAK2 signaling pathway, regulating skeletal muscle mass, growth, repair, and regeneration [ 30 ]. Numerous studies indicate the critical role of STAT3 activity in skeletal muscle pathology development like muscle cachexia [ 31 ].
Activation of the STAT3 pathway has been shown to induce muscle tissue atrophy in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), Merosin-negative congenital muscular dystrophy (MDC1A), sepsis, and in the vast majority of cancers [ 32 , 33 , 34 ]. STAT3 also affects the nervous and cardiovascular systems, directly affecting skeletal muscle function [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. The vast majority of papers suggest the participation of STAT3 in both physiological and pathological processes, demonstrating the multidimensional nature of STAT3 in skeletal muscle. STAT3 activity is a necessary condition during muscle tissue development and maintains its homeostasis, while STAT3 inhibitors seem to be a promising element in diseases involving muscle wasting. The IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway is currently the central object of research on cancer cachexia. In vivo studies show a pro-catabolic effect of STAT3 on skeletal muscles in experimentally induced cachexia [ 39 ]. Permanent activation of the acute phase protein response is considered the primary molecular mechanism contributing to cancer cachexia. The IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway induces a loss of muscle mass in experimental cachexia models via two pathways, where on the one hand, STAT3 phosphorylation leads to activation of hepatic acute phase protein gene expression [ 40 ].
On the other hand, skeletal muscles are a primary source of proteins triggering acute phase reaction [ 41 ]. The molecular mechanism of muscle mass loss via increased STAT3 activity activates the ubiquitin–proteasome system, either directly by STAT3 binding to ubiquitin-related gene promoters or indirectly by activation of caspase-3 [ 39 ]. An additional factor appears to be a reduction in protein synthesis by inhibition of mTOR activity by AMP-activated kinase (5′AMP-activated protein kinase, AMPK), observed mainly during the terminal stages of cancer cachexia [ 42 ]. Skeletal muscles are subjected to damaging stimuli, primarily due to cytokines produced by tumor cells, such as IL-6, TNF-α, and IFNγ, responsible for inflammation. The inflammatory response has been shown to promote cancer cell proliferation while inhibiting skeletal satellite cell differentiation. Satellite skeletal muscle cells maturing in a state of cachexia are characterized by Pax7 expression, corresponding with their proliferation, with no expression of myogenin, which proves impaired regeneration ability [ 43 ]. Thus, it is suspected that STAT3 promotes the expansion of the pool of satellite cells and plays a negative role in the differentiation and repair processes of skeletal muscles [ 44 ]. On the other hand, some of the most recent reports on the role of STAT3 in the functioning of skeletal muscle mitochondria are surprising and confirm the need for further research on STAT3 in skeletal muscles. Using STAT3 knockout mice proved that the loss of STAT3 does not affect the mitochondrial and physiological functions of skeletal muscles, both in in vivo and ex vivo studies [ 45 ].
As mentioned above, skeletal muscle is one of the most dynamic tissues of the body, maintaining an appropriate balance between anabolic and catabolic processes. Many growth factors, cytokines, and myokines produced by skeletal muscle cells play a vital role in the local regulation of inflammation and skeletal muscle regeneration in various pathological states. The vast majority of the activity of STAT3 depends on the IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway, which probably explains the contradictory reports on STAT3 activity in skeletal muscles. IL-6 is a pleiotropic cytokine released in large amounts during infection, autoimmunity, and cancer [ 30 ]. Low IL-6 levels may promote satellite cell activation and myotube regeneration, while chronically elevated production of that myokine promotes skeletal wasting [ 30 ].
5. STAT3 Protein in Cancer Cachexia
Cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome of skeletal muscle and fat loss, resulting in progressive weight loss closely associated with the overall cancer survival prognosis. Research emphasizes the critical role of humoral factors secreted by cancer cells in the patient’s tissues in the regulation of processes leading to cachexia, which also include pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6, TNF-α, IFNγ, IL-1α, and IL-1β. By the 90s of the last century, it was known that IL-6 is one of the main factors stimulating pathological changes in muscles. It was shown that using anti-IL-6R antibodies can inhibit muscular atrophy in IL-6 overexpressing transgenic mice [ 46 ]. In studies using ApcMin/+ mice, an established colon cancer and a cachexia model, administration of IL-6 receptor-specific antibodies prevented weight loss and suppressed protein degradation without affecting muscle protein synthesis or IGF-1-associated signaling [ 42 ]. In vitro studies in mouse myotubes have shown that IL-6 reduces the half-life of long-lived proteins by increased activity of the 26S proteasome and cathepsins B and L. This observation suggests that IL-6 increases the degradation of proteins in the muscles by activating both non-lysosomal (ubiquitin–proteasome) and lysosomal (cathepsin) processes. As research has shown [ 47 ], in addition to IL-6, IFNγ plays a central role in cachexia. In vivo studies, passive immunization against IFNγ and TNF-α of tumor-bearing rats allowed the intake of food, weight preservation, longer life, and better tolerance of larger tumors than in rats receiving a control antibody. Besides, IFNγ has been shown to inhibit MyHCII expression in skeletal muscle, an essential protein for skeletal muscle cell degradation [ 48 ]. Recent research by Ma et al. [ 49 ] proves that regardless of the interaction among IL-6, IFNγ, and TNF-α stimulation, the muscle mass loss is activated by the pSTAT3/NF-κβ pathway.
6. Synthetic STAT3 Inhibitors in Anticancer Therapy
The number of STAT3-interacting peptides currently tested in preclinical studies is almost countless. Peptides such as PY*LKTK [ 50 ], Y*LPQTV [ 51 ], SS610 [ 52 ], S3I-M2001 [ 53 ], STA-21 [ 54 ], and S3I-201 [ 54 ] bind to the SH2 domain and thus inhibit STAT3 dimerization. In turn, static [ 55 ] G-quartet oligodeoxynucleotides (ODN) [ 56 ] binding to the SH2 domain of STAT3 or JSI-124, and withacnistin that binds to JAK2 are examples of molecules that block the proper phosphorylation of STAT3. Another group of STAT3 inhibitors represented by IS3 295 [ 57 ], CPA-1, CPA-7 [ 58 ], galiellalactone [ 57 ], and peptide aptamers [ 59 , 60 ], bind to the DNA-binding domain (DBD) responsible for the binding of STAT3 to DNA, thereby blocking the transcriptional activation of STAT3-targeted genes. Regardless of whether the peptides mentioned above inhibit phosphorylation, dimerization, or binding of STAT3 to DNA, the effect of their interaction is the inhibition of malignant cell growth and transformation, intensification of apoptosis, and reduction of the invasiveness of cancer cells [ 61 ], which means that they have enormous potential in oncological research.
WP1066 is one of the novel pSTAT3 inhibitors that is currently registered as an “orphan drug” in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and has received approval for conducting a phase I clinical trial in the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) and melanoma metastases to the brain [ 62 ]. Due to its high bioavailability, after oral administration, WP1066 binds specifically both to JAK2 and JAK2 V617F—the mutated form characteristic for cancer cells, thus inhibiting phosphorylation and kinase activation [ 63 ]. Numerous in vitro and in vivo studies on renal cell carcinoma [ 64 ], bladder cancer cells [ 65 ], and GBM [ 66 , 67 ] proved the high effectiveness of WP1066 in limiting the growth and survival of cancer cells. Studies on tumor metastasis suggest a positive role of WP1066 in reducing breast cancer cells’ metastasis to the brain [ 68 ]. It should be emphasized that the high activity of STAT3 is also one of the main mechanisms of pancreatic cancer cell proliferation [ 69 ]. The fourth, most common neoplasm of this organ—pancreatic ductal carcinoma (PDAC)—is characterized by constitutive activation of STAT3 [ 69 ] with a 5-year survival rate <5% [ 70 ]. Moreover, STAT3 determines the development of features related to the malignancy of pancreatic cancer. In vivo studies show that blocking STAT3 phosphorylation inhibits the growth of PDAC [ 69 ]. As shown in previous studies, WP1066 inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells, reduces the expression of STAT3-dependent anti-apoptotic proteins (Bcl-xL, survivin), and blocks constitutive and IL-6-induced STAT3 phosphorylation [ 69 ]. Preliminary in vivo studies show that WP1066 significantly reduces this tumor’s growth rate [ 70 ]. Therefore, it is possible to achieve a dual effect of WP1066 supporting pancreatic cancer therapy: inhibition of pSTAT3 activity may limit the induction of damage in skeletal muscle cells and, at the same time, reduce pSTAT3 activity in pancreatic cancer cells and effectively eliminate them.
On the other hand, preclinical studies have shown that WP1066 stimulates the natural immune response to tumors while inhibiting oncogenic transcription factors such as STAT3, but also HIF1-α and c-Myc [ 71 ]. As a result, WP1066 belongs to the group of drugs known as “immunity and transduction modulators,” representing excellent potential in clinical oncology.
Another drug candidate STAT3 inhibitor is OPB-31121. OPB-31121 inhibits the phosphorylation of STAT3 and STAT5 without upstream kinase inhibition and has beneficial effects in various types of hematopoietic malignancies, such as multiple myeloma; Burkitt lymphoma; and leukemia harboring BCR-ABL, FLT3/ITD, and JAK2 V61F oncokinases with their oncogenicities dependent on STAT3/5 [ 72 ]. OPB-31121 has been shown to bind exclusively to the SH2 domain of STAT3, which provides specific binding with site-directed mutagenesis of critical residues in the SH2 STAT3 domain [ 72 ]. Moreover, due to the lack of STAT upstream kinases inhibition, OPB-31121 was safe for normal human blood cells, making it a promising antitumor compound [ 73 ]. Two clinical trials concerning OPB-31121 in the treatment of solid tumors and hepatocellular carcinoma have been completed, which gives hope for the further development of this compound as a drug used in clinical oncology.
Pyrimethamine is one of the folic acid antagonists, inhibiting dihydrofolate reductase [ 74 ]. Pyrimethamine is a successfully used malarial drug and is undergoing clinical trials to treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic leukemia [ 75 ]. More interestingly, cachexia–anorexia syndrome is often a phenomenon in the course of malaria [ 76 ]. Thus, pyrimethamine has been studied only in the context of antiprotozoal properties, and it may turn out that this compound also protects against weight loss during malaria [ 77 ].
Reports on OPB-51602, another oral small-molecule STAT3 inhibitor with potential antineoplastic activity, show its effectiveness in patients with advances solid tumors [ 78 ]. OPB-51602 inhibits phosphorylation and thus the activation of STAT3. OPB-51602 interferes with mitochondrial activity, and protein tumor cells expressing a mitochondrially restricted form of STAT3 are highly sensitive to OPB-51602, while STAT3-null cells are protected [ 79 ]. Targeting the mitochondrial function of STAT3 induces mortality homeostasis, leading to a synthetic lethality effect in glucose-depleted cancers cells [ 80 ] by inhibiting complex I, which could be used in cancer chemotherapy [ 80 ]. Regardless of STAT3 inhibition, OPB-51602 also inhibits the mitochondrial respiratory chain and induces a significant increase in mitochondrial superoxide (O2) production (within 1 h of exposure) in the NSCLC H1975 cell line [ 81 ]. Further work on OPB-51602 showed an increased dependence on mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (XPHOS) in oncogene-dependent tumors exhibiting acquired resistance to targeted therapies. Thus, OPB-51602 gives hope in treating patients who have developed a secondary resistance to standard chemotherapeutic agents such as tyrosine reductase inhibitors, contributing to the reduction of tumor size.
TTI-101 is an example of a STAT3 inhibitor, particularly interesting in terms of muscle cachexia. The use of TTI-101 has been so far explored in muscle loss associated with chronic kidney disease. TTI-101 blocks the STAT3/CCAAT enhancer-binding protein γ, which directly inhibits the myostatin signaling pathway—the one responsible for muscle protein degradation in both chronic kidney disease and cancer [ 82 ]. Recruitment for clinical trials on TTI-101 is currently underway in breast cancer, head, neck squamous cell carcinoma, non–small-cell lung cancer, hepatocellular cancer, colorectal cancer, gastric adenocarcinoma, and melanoma, which gives hope for a positive development of this drug.
Napabucasin (BBI608) is an orally bioavailable small molecule known to inhibit cancer stem cells’ activity in the JAK2/STAT3 pathway [ 83 ]. Constitutive expression of STAT3 in cancer stem cells independent of upstream signaling regulators confirms the validity of targeting STAT3 in those cells [ 84 ]. The positive effects of napabucasin have been confirmed in in vitro, in vivo studies, and clinical trials. Napabucasin reduces the viability of cancer cells and inhibits the renewal of cancer stem cells, and most interestingly, it reduces the pool of cancer stem cells, while standard chemotherapy may increase a sub-population of this type of cell [ 85 ]. In clinical trials, napabucasin has been tested both as monotherapy and in combination with cytostatics, mainly with paclitaxel [ 84 ]. Positive results of napabucasin action have been confirmed in non–small-cell lung cancer, gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma, bladder cancer, melanoma, ovarian cancer, small-cell lung cancer, esophageal squamous cell cancer, colorectal cancer, and penile squamous cell cancer [ 85 ]. Of those mentioned above, the synthetic STAT3 inhibitor napabucasin seems to be the most promising compound, due to its high efficiency and very low toxicity, mainly due to a higher affinity for cancer than normal cells [ 83 ]. The clinical development of the selected STAT3 inhibitors is summarized in Table 2 .
7. Natural STAT3 Inhibitors
It is worth noting that there are also available natural pSTAT3 inhibitors such as CAPE (caffeic acid phenethyl ester), which is isolated from propolis. Numerous in vitro and in vivo reports indicate CAPE’s high efficiency in the induction of apoptosis, characterized by dysregulation of mitochondria and activation of caspase 3 and 7 in cancer cells [ 86 ]. Breast cancer reports [ 87 ] show that CAPE induces cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and reduction of expression of transcription factors such as NF-κβ. The last feature may have a direct impact on the inhibition of muscle cachexia. In turn, in vivo studies on the orthotopic model of pancreatic cancer, in the course of which the strongest muscle cachexia is observed, confirm that CAPE inhibits tumor growth [ 88 ] while possessing very low cytotoxicity compared to standard chemotherapeutics. CAPE also protects skeletal muscle cells by stimulating glucose uptake and activation of the AMPK pathway (AMP-activated protein kinase) [ 89 ]. Other reports mention anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and protective effects against free radicals in skeletal muscles in the pathophysiology of ischemia–reperfusion (I/R) injury [ 90 ].
Capsaicin supplementation is an excellent example of dietary management that inhibits solid tumors [ 91 ]. In vivo studies on Walker 256 tumor-bearing rats showed that supplementation with capsaicin (5 mg/kg) reduced tumor size by 49% and reversed serum triacylglycerol concentrations [ 92 ]. Moreover, in vivo studies confirm the anticancer effect of capsaicin in skin, prostate, colon, lung, and tongue cancer [ 93 ]. However, more and more studies show that constant supplementation of capsaicin increases the feeling of satiety and reduces food intake, which makes the use of this compound in oncological cachexia questionable [ 93 ].
Probably the most popular naturally occurring substance is curcumin, a natural diphenolic compound. Curcumin is a well-known modulator of intracellular signaling pathways that govern cancer cell growth, inflammation, and metastasis, thus showing high anticancer properties [ 94 ]. The use of curcumin’s anticancer properties as a STAT3 inhibitor has been demonstrated in numerous studies. The positive effect of inhibition of JAK1,2/STAT3 signaling by curcumin has been both confirmed by in vitro studies on multiple myeloma cells [ 95 ], cancer stem cells [ 96 ], Hodgkin’s lymphoma cells [ 97 ], small lung cancer cells [ 98 ], and in in vivo models such as glioma development in a syngeneic mouse [ 99 ], a rodent model of lung cancer [ 100 ] and human non–small-cell lung cancer xenografts [ 101 ]. There is no doubt about curcumin’s anticancer properties, but curcumin’s potential beneficial effect on muscle cachexia is highly debatable. In vitro and in vivo experiments are contradictory. Some reports showed a curcumin protective effect against loss of muscle and adipose tissue in oncological cachexia. For example, curcumin administration to tumor-bearing rats did not result in any changes in muscle loss [ 102 , 103 ] or even a negative effect on weight loss, as demonstrated in studies with curcumin supplementation in advanced pancreatic cancer patients [ 104 ]. Other reports indicated a beneficial effect of curcumin on muscle cachexia [ 105 , 106 ]. However, further research on curcumin’s influence on oncological cachexia is needed [ 107 ]. Among other natural STAT3 inhibitors with antitumor properties, butein [ 108 ] and ursolic acid [ 109 ] are worth mentioning. Therefore, dietary management involving supplementation of natural STAT3 inhibitors may help prevent alleviating changes during the development of cachexia in skeletal muscles.
8. Perspectives
Based on the described above rationale and the critical role of STAT3 in oncogenesis and muscle cachexia processes, we hypothesize that STAT3 blockage could exert a dualistic effect—anticancer cytotoxicity, and at the same time, disrupt the cachectic signaling pathway. Our hypothesis is currently under investigation in our laboratory. The schematic representation of the hypothesis mentioned above is illustrated in Figure 2 . As far as we know, no available studies evaluate the biological effects of STAT3 inhibition on cancer-induced cachexia in one experimental model.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest
B.P. is a CSO at WPD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The funder had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
References
1. Donohoe C.L. Ryan A.M. Reynolds J.V. Cancer Cachexia: Mechanisms and clinical implications Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2011 2011 601434 10.1155/2011/601434 21760776 PMC3132494
2. Siren P.M.A. Siren M.J. Systemic zinc redistribution and dyshomeostasis in cancer cachexia J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2010 1 23 33 10.1007/s13539-010-0009-z 21475700 PMC3060652
3. Grabiec K. Burchert M. Milewska M. Błaszczyk M. Grzelkowska-Kowalczyk K. Systemic and local mechanisms leading to cachexia in cancer Postępy Hig. Med. Dos. 2013 67 1397 1409 10.5604/17322693.1085135 24493689
4. Aoyagi T. Terracina K.P. Raza A. Matsubara H. Takabe K. Cancer cachexia, mechanism and treatment World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2015 7 17 29 10.4251/wjgo.v7.i4.17 25897346 PMC4398892
5. Dhanapal R. Saraswathi T.R. Govind R.N. Cancer cachexia J. Oral Maxillofac. Pathol. 2011 15 257 260 10.4103/0973-029X.86670 22144825 PMC3227249
6. Onesti J.K. Guttridge D.C. Inflammation based regulation of cancer cachexia Biomed. Res. Int. 2014 168407 10.1155/2014/168407 24877061 PMC4022077
7. Zhou J. Liu B. Liang C. Li Y. Song Y.H. Cytokine signalling in skeletal muscle wasting Trends Endrocrinol. Metab. 2016 27 335 347 10.1016/j.tem.2016.03.002 27025788
8. Khal J. Wyke S.M. Russell S.T. Hine A.V. Tisdale M.J. Expression of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and muscle loss in experimental cancer cachexia Br. J. Cancer 2005 93 774 780 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602780 16160695 PMC2361629
9. Scherbakov N. Doehner W. Cachexia as a common characteristic in multiple chronic diseases J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2019 9 1189 1191 10.1002/jcsm.12388 PMC6351667 30637985
10. Tarin D. Update on clinical and mechanistic aspects of paraneoplastic syndromes Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2013 32 707 721 10.1007/s10555-013-9446-4 24052434
11. Ezeoke C.C. Morley J. Pathophysiology of anorexia in the cancer cachexia syndrome J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2015 6 287 302 10.1002/jcsm.12059 26675762 PMC4670736
12. Akamizu T. Kangawa K. Ghrelin for cachexia J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2010 1 169 176 10.1007/s13539-010-0011-5 21475698 PMC3060649
13. Chevalier S. Farsijani S. Cancer cachexia and diabetes: Similarities in metabolic alterations and possible treatment Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2013 39 10.1139/apnm-2013-0369 24869969
14. Tuca A. Jimenez-Fonseca P. Gascon P. Clinical evaluation and optimal management of cancer cachexia Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hemat. 2013 88 625 636 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.07.015 23953794
15. Penna F. Busquets S. Toledo M.I. Pin F. Massa D. Lopez-Soriano F.J. Costelli P. Argiles J.M. Erythropoietin administration partially prevent adipose tissue loss in experimental cancer cachexia models J. Lipid Res. 2013 54 3045 3051 10.1194/jlr.M038406 23966665 PMC3793608
16. Gullett N.P. Mazurak V. Hebbar G. Ziegler T. Nutritional interventions for cancer-induced cachexia Curr. Probl. Cancer. 2011 35 58 90 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2011.01.001 21420558 PMC3106221
17. Fagard R. Metelev V. Ines S. Baran-Marszak F. STAT3 inhibitors for cancer therapy. Have all roads been explored? JAK-STAT 2013 2 e22882 10.4161/jkst.22882 24058788 PMC3670264
18. Yu H. Pardoll D. Jove R. STATs in cancer inflammation and immunity: A leading role for STAT3 Nat. Rev. Cancer 2009 9 798 809 10.1038/nrc2734 19851315 PMC4856025
19. Crescenzo R. Abate F. Lasora E. Tabbo F. Gaudiano M. Chiesa N. Di Giacomo F. Spaccartolla E. Barbarossa L. Ercole E. Convergent mutations and kinase fusions lead to oncogenic STAT3 activation in anaplastic large cell lymphoma Cancer Cell. 2015 7 516 532 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.03.006 PMC5898430 25873174
20. Brachet-Botineau M. Polomski M. Neubauer H. Juen L. Hedou D. Viaud-Massurd M.-C. Prie G. Gouilleux F. Pharmacological inhibition of oncogenic STAT3 and STAT5 signaling in hematopoietic cancers Cancers 2020 12 240 10.3390/cancers12010240 31963765 PMC7016966
21. Siveen K.S. Sikka S. Surana R. Di X. Zhang J. Kumar A.P. Tan B.K.H. Sethi G. Bishayee A. Targeting the STAT3 signaling pathway in cancer: Role of synthetic and natural inhibitors Biochem. Biophys. Acta 2014 1845 136 154 10.1016/j.bbcan.2013.12.005 24388873
22. Hedvat M. Huszar D. Herrmann A. Gozgit J.M. Schroeder A. Sheehy A. Buettner R. Proia D. Kowolik C.M. Xin H. The JAK2 inhibitor AZD1480 potently blocks Stat3 signaling and oncogenesis in solid tumors Cancer Cell. 2009 16 487 497 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.10.015 19962667 PMC2812011
23. Lu R. Zhang Y. Sun J. STAT3 activation in infection and infection-associated cancer Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2017 451 80 87 10.1016/j.mce.2017.02.023 28223148 PMC5469714
24. Bournazou E. Bromberg J. Targeting the tumor microenvironment JAK-STAT3 Signal. 2013 2 10.4161/jkst.23828 PMC3710325 24058812
25. Gaudagin E. Mazala D. Chen Y.W. STAT3 in skeletal muscle function and disorders Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018 19 2265 10.3390/ijms19082265 30072615 PMC6121875
26. Araujo E.D. Keseru G.M. Gunning P.T. Moriggl R. Targeting STAT3 and STAT5 in cancer Cancers 2020 12 2002 10.3390/cancers12082002 PMC7465272 32707820
27. Tierney M.T. Aydogdu T. Sala D. Malecova B. Gatto S. Puri P.L. Latella L. Sacco A. STAT3 signaling controls satellite cell expansion and skeletal muscle repair Nat. Med. 2014 20 1182 1186 10.1038/nm.3656 25194572 PMC4332844
28. Zhu H. Xiao F. Wang G. Wei X. Jiang L. Chen Y. Zhu L. Wang H. Diao Y. Wang H. STAT3 regulates the self-renewal of adult muscle satellite cells during injury-induced muscle regeneration Cell Rep. 2016 16 2102 2115 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.07.041 27524611
29. Wong Y.Q. Xu H. Wu Q. Liu X. Lufei C. Xu X.Q. Fu X.Y. STAT3-inducible mouse ESCs: A model to study the role of STAT3 in ESC maintenance and lineage differentiation Stem Cells Int. 2018 2018 8632950 10.1155/2018/8632950 30254684 PMC6142778
30. He W.A. Berardi E. Cardillo V.M. Acharyya S. Aulino P. Ahner J. Wang J. Bloomston M. Muscarella P. Nau P. NF- κβ-mediated Pax7 dysregulation in the muscle microenvironment promotes cancer cachexia J. Clin. Investig. 2013 123 4821 4835 10.1172/JCI68523 24084740 PMC3809785
31. Zimmers T.A. Fishel M.L. Bonetto A. STAT3 in the systemic inflammation of cancer cachexia Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2016 54 28 41 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.02.009 26860754 PMC4867234
32. Nunes A.M. Wuebbles R.D. Sarathy A. Fontelonga T.M. Deries M. Burkin D.J. Thorsteinsdottir S. Impaired fetal muscle development and JAK-STAT activation mark disease onset and progression in a mouse model for merosin-deficient congenital muscular dystrophy Hum. Mol. Gen. 2017 26 2018 2033 10.1093/hmg/ddx083 28334989 PMC6075618
33. Wada E. Tanihata J. Iwamura A. Takeda S. Hayashi Y. Matsuda R. Treatment with the anti-IL-6 receptor antibody attenuates muscular dystrophy via promoting skeletal muscle regeneration in dystrophin-/utrophin-deficient mice Skelet. Muscle 2017 7 23 10.1186/s13395-017-0140-z 29078808 PMC5660454
34. Liang F. Li T. Azuelos I. Giordano C. Liang H. Hussain S. Matecki S. Petrof B. Ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction in MDX mice Muscle Nerve 2018 57 442 448 10.1002/mus.25760 28786111
35. Liu J. Liu Y. Chen J. Hu C. Teng M. Jiao K. Shen Z. Yue J. Zhong L. Li Y. The ROS-mediated activation of the IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway is involved in the 27-hydroxycholesterol-induced cellular senescence in nerve cells Toxicol. In Vitro 2017 45 10 18 10.1016/j.tiv.2017.07.013 28739487
36. Benito C. Davis C.M. Gomez-Sanchez J.A. Turmaine M. Meijer D. Poli V. Rhona M. Jessen K.R. STAT3 controls the long-term survival and phenotype of repair Schwann cells during nerve regeneration J. Neurosci. 2017 37 4255 4269 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3481-16.2017 28320842 PMC5413174
37. Liao X.H. Xiang Y. Li H. Zheng D.L. Xu Y. Yu C.X. Li J.P. Zhang X.Y. Xing W.B. Cao D.S. VEGF-A stimulates STAT3 activity via nitrosylation of myocardium to regulate the expression of vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation markers Sci. Rep. 2017 7 2660 10.1038/s41598-017-02907-6 28572685 PMC5453982
38. Yang X. Lin A. Jiang N. Yan H. Ni Z. Qian J. Fang W. Interleukin-6 trans-signaling induces vascular endothelial growth factor synthesis partly via Janus kinases-STAT3 pathway in human mesothelial cells Nephrology 2017 22 150 158 10.1111/nep.12746 26869278
39. Bonetto A. Aydogdu T. Jin X. Zhang Z. Puzis L. Koniaris L.G. Zimmers T.A. JAK/STAT3 pathway inhibition blocks skeletal muscle wasting downstream of Il-6 in experimental cancer cachexia Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metabol. 2012 303 410 421 10.1152/ajpendo.00039.2012 PMC3423125 22669242
40. Watchorn T.M. Waddell I. Dowidar N. Ross J.A. Proteolysis-inducing factor regulates hepatic gene expression via the transcription factors NF-(kappa)B and STAT3 FASEB J. 2001 15 562 564 10.1096/fj.00-0534fje 11259367
41. Stephens N.A. Skipworth R.J.E. Fearon K.C. Cachexia, survival, and the acute phase response Curr. Opin. Supp. Palliat. Care 2008 2 267 274 10.1097/SPC.0b013e3283186be2 19060563
42. White J.P. Bayness J.W. Welle S.L. Kostek M.C. Matesic L.E. Sato S. Carson J.A. The regulation of skeletal muscle protein turnover during the progression of cancer cachexia in the ApcMin/+ mouse PLoS ONE 2011 6 e24650 10.1371/journal.pone.0024650 21949739 PMC3176277
43. Mehl K.A. Davis M. Berger F.G. Carson J.A. Myofiber degeneration/regeneration is induced in the cachectic ApcMin/+ mouse J. Appl. Physiol. 2005 99 2379 2387 10.1152/japplphysiol.00778.2005 16288100
44. Dent J.R. Byron H. Shahriar T. Sathe A. LaBarge S.A. Svensson K. McCurdy C.E. Schenk S. Skeletal muscle mitochondrial function and exercise capacity are not impaired in mice with knockout of STAT3 J. Appl. Physiol. 2019 127 1117 1127 10.1152/japplphysiol.00003.2019 31513449 PMC6850983
45. Belizario J.E. Fontes-Oliveira C.C. Borges J.P. Kashiabara J.A. Vannier E. Skeletal muscle wasting and renewal: A pivotal role of myokine Il-6 Springerplus 2016 5 619 10.1186/s40064-016-2197-2 27330885 PMC4870483
46. Narsale A.A. Carson J.A. Role of IL-6 in cachexia–therapeutic implications Curr. Opin. Support. Palliat. Care 2015 8 321 327 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000091 PMC4323347 25319274
47. Mendes M.C.S. Pimentel G.D. Costa F.O. Carvalheira J.B. Molecular and neuroendocrine mechanisms of cancer cachexia J. Endocrinol. 2015 226 R29 R43 10.1530/JOE-15-0170 26112046
48. Pijet B. Pijet M. Litwiniuk A. Gajweska M. Pająk B. Orzechowski A. TNF-α and IFN-s-Dependent muscle decay is linked to NF-κβ and STAT-1α-stimulated Atrogin1 and MURF1 genes in C2C12 myotubes Mediat. Inflamm. 2013 2013 171437 10.1155/2013/171437 PMC3877628 24453411
49. Ma J.F. Sanchez B.J. Hall D.T. Tremblay A.M.K. Di Marco S. Gallouzi I.E. STAT3 promotes IFN γ/TNF-α induced muscle wasting in an NF-κβ-dependent and IL-6-independent manner EMBO Mol. Med. 2017 9 622 637 10.15252/emmm.201607052 28264935 PMC5412921
50. Lee H. Jeong A.J. Ye S.K. Highlighted STAT3 as a potential drug target for cancer therapy BMB Rep. 2019 52 415 423 10.5483/BMBRep.2019.52.7.152 31186087 PMC6675244
51. Ren Z. Cabell L.A. Schaefer T.S. McMurray J.S. Identification of a high-affinity phosphopeptide inhibitor of Stat3 Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003 13 633 636 10.1016/S0960-894X(02)01050-8 12639546
52. Turkson J. Zhang S. Palmer J. Kay H. Stanko J. Mora L.B. Sebti S. Yu H. Jove R. Inhibition of constitutive signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 activation by novel platinum complexes with potent antitumor activity Mol. Cancer Ther. 2004 3 1533 1542 15634646
53. Siddiquee K. Zhang S. Guida W.C. Blaskovich M.A. Greedy B. Lawrence H.R. Yip M.L. Jove R. McLaughlin M.M. Lawrence N.J. Selective chemical probe inhibitor of Stat3, identified through structure-based virtual screening, induces antitumor activity Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007 104 7396 10.1073/pnas.0609757104 17463090 PMC1863497
54. Song H. Wang R. Wang S. Lin J. A low-molecular-weight compound discovered through virtual database screening inhibits Stat3 function in breast cancer cells Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005 102 4700 4705 10.1073/pnas.0409894102 15781862 PMC555708
55. Pan Y. Zhou F. Zhang R. Claret F.X. STAT3 inhibitor Stattic exhibits potent antitumor activity and induces chemo- and radio-sensitivity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma PLoS ONE 2013 8 e54565 10.1371/journal.pone.0054565 23382914 PMC3558509
56. Jinn N. Zhu Q. Yuan P. Li Y. Mao L. Tweardy D.J. Targeting signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 with G-quartet oligonucleotides: A potential novel therapy for head and neck cancer Mol. Cancer Ther. 2006 5 279 286 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0302 16505101
57. Handle F. Puhr M. Schaefer G. Lorito N. Hoefer J. Gruber M. Guggenberger F. Santer F.R. Marques R.B. van Weerden W.M. The STAT3 inhibitor Galiellalactone reduces IL-6-mediated AR activity in benign and malignant prostate models Mol. Cancer Ther. 2018 17 2722 2731 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-18-0508 30254184
58. Turkson J. Zhang S. Mora L.B. Burns A. Sebti S. Jove R. A novel platinium compound inhibits constitutive Stat3 signaling and induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of malignant cells J. Biol. Chem. 2005 280 32979 32988 10.1074/jbc.M502694200 16046414
59. Nagel-Wolfrum K. Buerger C. Wittig I. Butz K. Hoppe-Seyler F. Groner B. The interaction of specific peptide aptamers with the DNA binding domain and the dimerization domain of the transcription factor Stat3 inhibits transactivation and induces apoptosis in tumor cells Mol. Cancer Res. 2004 2 170 182 15037656
60. Trecul A. Morceau F. Dicato M. Diederich M. Dietary compounds as potent inhibitors of the signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT)3 regulatory network Genes Nutr. 2012 7 111 125 10.1007/s12263-012-0281-y 22274779 PMC3316753
61. Assi H.H. Paran C. VanderVeen N. Savakus J. Doherty R. Petruzzella E. Hoeschele J.D. Appelman H. Raptis L. Mikkelsen T. Preclinical characterization of signal molecule inhibitors for primary and metastatic brain cancer therapy J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2014 349 458 469 10.1124/jpet.114.214619 24696041 PMC4019317
62. Sayyah J. Sayeski P.P. Jak2 inhibitors: Rationale and role as therapeutic agents in hematologic malignancies Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2009 11 117 124 10.1007/s11912-009-0018-2 19216843 PMC2805456
63. Horiguchi A. Asano T. Kuoda K. Sato A. Asakuma J. Ito K. Hayakawa M. Sumitomo M. Asano T. STAT3 inhibitor WP1066 as a novel therapeutic agent for renal cell carcinoma Br. J. Cancer 2010 102 1592 1599 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605691 20461084 PMC2883159
64. Tsujita Y. Horiguchi A. Tasaki S. Isono M. Asano T. Ito K. Asano T. Mayumi Y. Kushibiki T. STAT3 inhibition by WP1066 suppresses the growth and invasiveness of bladder cancer cells Oncol. Rep. 2017 38 2197 2204 10.3892/or.2017.5902 28849140
65. Iwamaru A. Szymanowski S. Iwado E. Aoki H. Yokoyama T. Fokt I. Hess K. Conrad C. Madden T. Sawaya R. A novel inhibitor of the STAT3 pathway induces apoptosis in malignant glioma cells both in vitro and in vivo Oncogene 2007 26 2435 2444 10.1038/sj.onc.1210031 17043651
66. Hussain S.F. Kong L.Y. Jordan J. Conrad C. Madden T. Fokt I. Priebe W. Heimberger A.B. A novel small molecule inhibitor of signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 reverses immune tolerance in malignant glioma patients Cancer Res. 2007 67 3713 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1243 17942891
67. Lee H.T. Xue J. Chou P.C. Zhou A. Yang P. Conrad C.A. Aldape K.D. Priebe W. Patterson C. Sawaya R. STAT3 orchestrates the interaction between endothelial and tumor cells and inhibition of STAT3 suppresses brain metastasis of breast cancer cells Oncotarget 2015 6 10016 10029 10.18632/oncotarget.3540 25881542 PMC4496337
68. Corcoran R.B. Contino G. Deshpande V. Tzatsos A. Conrad C. Benes C.H. Levy D.E. Settleman J. Engelman J.A. Bardeesy N. STAT3 plays a critical role in KRAS- induced pancreatic tumorigenesis Cancer Res. 2011 71 5020 5029 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0908 21586612 PMC3693754
69. Grant T.J. Hua K. Singh A. Molecular pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2016 144 241 275 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2016.09.008 27865459 PMC6260831
70. Guha S. Chakraborty A. Szymanski S. Fokt I. Abbruzzese J. Kazerooni R. Madden T. Priebe W. WP1066, a potent inhibitor of Jak2/STAT3 pathway inhibits pancreatic tumor growth both in vitro and in vivo Cancer Res. 2007 67 2393
71. Wang Y. Wang H. Yao H. Li C. Fang J.Y. Xu J. Regulation of PD-L1: Emerging routes for targeting tumor immune evasion Front. Pharmacol. 2018 9 536 10.3389/fphar.2018.00536 29910728 PMC5992436
72. Hayakawa F. Sugimoto K. Harada Y. Hashimoto N. Ohi N. Kurahashi S. Naoe T. A novel STAT inhibitor, OPB-31121, has a significant antitumor effect on leukemia with STAT-addictive oncokinases Blood Cancer J. 2013 e166 10.1038/bcj.2013.63 24292418 PMC3880446
73. Brambilla L. Genini D. Laurini E. Merulla J. Perez L. Fermeglia M. Carbone G.M. Pricl S. Catapano C. Hitting the right spot: Mechanism of action of OPB-31121, a novel and potent inhibitor of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 (STAT3) Mol. Oncol. 2015 9 1194 1206 10.1016/j.molonc.2015.02.012 25777967 PMC5528765
74. Ryan E.T. Antiparasitic Agents. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious Diseases 5th ed. Elsevier Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2018 10.1016/C2013-0-19020-4
75. Nelson E.A. Sharma S.V. Settleman J. Frank D.A. A chemical biology approach to developing STAT inhibitors: Molecular strategies for accelerating clinical translation Oncotarget 2011 2 518 524 10.18632/oncotarget.296 21680956 PMC3248200
76. Friedman J.F. Kurtis J.D. Ramadhan M. Opollo M. Lanar D.E. Duffy P.E. Malaria is related to decreased nutritional status among male adolescents and adults in the setting of intense perennial transmission J. Inf. Dis. 2003 188 449 457 10.1086/376596 12870128
77. Onwuamaegbu M.E. Henein M.Y. Stewart Coats A.J. Cachexia in malaria and heart failure: Therapeutic considerations in clinical practice Postgrad. Med. J. 2004 80 642 649 10.1136/pgmj.2004.020891 15537847 PMC1743137
78. Wong L.A. Soo R.A. Tan D.S. Lee S.C. Lim J.S. Marban P.C. Kong L.R. Lee Y.J. Wang L.Z. Thuya W.L. Phase I and biomarker study of OPB-51602, a novel signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)3 inhibitor, in patients with refractory solid malignancies Orig. Artic. Early Drug Dev. 2015 5 998 1005 10.1093/annonc/mdv026 25609248
79. Genini D. Brambilla L. Laurini E. Merulla J. Civenii G. Pandit S. D’Antuono R. Perez L. Levy D.E. Pricl S. Mitochondrial dysfunction induced by SH2 domain-targeting STAT3 inhibitor leads to metabolic synthetic lethality in cancer cells Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017 114 E4924 E4933 10.1073/pnas.1615730114 28584133 PMC5488915
80. Brambilla L. Lahiri T. Cammer M. Levy D.E. OPB-51602, a direct inhibitor of STAT3, impairs growth and viability of respiratory Complex I Cell Papers 2020 3575125 10.2139/ssrn.3575125
81. Hirpara J.L. Higuchi K. Tsunoda T. Goh B.C. Pervaiz S. OPB-51602: A novel STAT3 inhibitor that targets mitochondrial respiratory chain and triggers STAT3 dependent ROS production Exp. Mol. Ther. 2016 76 833 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2016-3080
82. Zhang L. Wang Y. Dong Y. Chen Z. Eckols T.K. Kasembeli M.M. Tweardy D.J. Mitch W.E. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of TTI-101, a STAT3 inhibitor that blocks muscle proteolysis in rats with chronic kidney disease Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2020 319 F84 F92 10.1152/ajprenal.00603.2019 32475130 PMC7541954
83. Hubbard J.M. Grothey A. Napabucasin: An update on the first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor Drugs 2017 77 1091 1103 10.1007/s40265-017-0759-4 28573435
84. Hitron M. Stephenson J. Chi K.N. Edenfield W.J. Leggett D. LiWei L.Y. Gada K. Li C. A phase 1b study of the cancer stem cell inhibitor BBI608 administered with paclitaxel in patients with advanced malignancies J. Clin. Oncol. 2014 32 2530 10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.2530
85. Li Y. Rogoff H.A. Keates S. Gao Y. Murikipudi S. Mikule K. Leggett D. Li W. Pardee A.B. Li C.J. Suppression of cancer relapse and metastasis by inhibiting cancer stemness Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015 112 1839 1844 10.1073/pnas.1424171112 25605917 PMC4330785
86. Chen M.J. Chang W.H. Lin C.C. Liu C.Y. Wang T.E. Chu C.H. Shih S.C. Chen Y.J. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester induces apoptosis of human pancreatic cancer cells involving caspase and mitochondrial dysfunction Pancreatology 2008 8 566 576 10.1159/000159214 18824880
87. Wu J. Omene C. Karkoszka J. Bosland M. Eckard J. Klein C.B. Frenkel K. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), derived from a honeybee product propolis, exhibits a diversity of antitumor effects in preclinical models of human breast cancer Cancer Lett. 2011 308 43 53 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.04.012 21570765 PMC3144783
88. Chen M.J. Shih S.C. Wang H.Y. Lin C.C. Liu C.Y. Wang T.E. Chu C.H. Chen Y.J. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition of human pancreatic cancer cells Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2013 2013 270906 10.1155/2013/270906 PMC3638595 23662124
89. Lee E.S. Uhm K.O. Lee Y.M. Han M.S. Lee M.S. Man Park J. Suh P.G. Park S.H. Kim H.S. CAPE (caffeic acid phenethyl ester) stimulates glucose uptake through AMPK (AMP-activated protein kinase) activation in skeletal muscle cells Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 2007 361 854 858 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.07.068 17689496
90. Ozyurt B. Iraz M. Koca K. Ozyurt H. Sahin S. Protective effects of caffeic acid phenethyl ester on skeletal muscle ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats Mol. Cell Biochem. 2006 292 197 203 10.1007/s11010-006-9232-5 16786192
91. Bello S.R. Naliwaiko K. Vicentini M.S. Rossetti F.X. Fernandes L.C. Messias-Reason I.J. Nutrition and cancer capsaicin treatment reduce tumor growth, tumor cell proliferation ex vivo and partially reverses cancer cachexia in Walker 256 tumor-bearing rats Nutr. Cancer 2019 71 111 117 10.1080/01635581.2018.1557219 30741012
92. Cazenave S.M. Olea-Herrero N. Vara D. Morell C. Diaz-Laviada I. The vanilloid capsaicin induces Il-6 secretion in prostate PC-3 cancer cells Cytokine 2011 54 330 337 10.1016/j.cyto.2011.03.010 21474332
93. Janssens P.L.H.R. Hursel R. Westerterp-Plantenga M.S. Capsaicin increases the sensation of fullness in energy balance and decreases the desire to eat after dinner in negative energy balance Appetite 2014 77 44 49 10.1016/j.appet.2014.02.018 24630935
94. Yallapu M.M. Jaggi M. Chauhan S. Curcumin nanoformulations: A future nanomedicine for cancer Drug Discov. Today 2012 17 71 80 10.1016/j.drudis.2011.09.009 21959306 PMC3259195
95. Kudo C. Yamakoshi H. Sato A. Ohori H. Ishioka C. Iwabuchi Y. Shibata H. Novel curcumin analogs, GO-Y030 and GO-Y078, are multi-targeted agents with enhanced abilities for multiple myeloma Anticancer Res. 2011 31 3719 3726 22110192
96. Chung S.S. Vadgama J.V. Curcumin and epigallocatechin gallate inhibit the cancer stem cell phenotype via down-regulation of STAT3-NFκB signaling Anticancer Res. 2015 35 39 46 25550533 PMC4290892
97. Qiao Q. Jiang Y. Li G. Curcumin enhances the response of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma cells to ionizing radiation through further induction of cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase and inhibition of mTOR phosphorylation Oncol. Rep. 2013 29 380 386 10.3892/or.2012.2091 23117293
98. Yang C.L. Liu Y.Y. Ma Y.G. Vue Y.X. Liu D.G. Ren Y. Xiao-Bai L. Yao L. Li Z. Curcumin blocks small cell lung cancer cells migration, invasion, angiogenesis, cell cycle, and neoplasia through the Janus kinase-STAT3 signaling pathway PLoS ONE 2012 7 e37960 10.1371/journal.pone.0037960 22662257 PMC3360669
99. Weissenberger J. Priester M. Bernreuther C. Rakel S. Glatzel M. Seifert V. Kogel D. Dietary curcumin attenuates glioma growth in a syngeneic mouse model by inhibition of the JAK1/2/STAT3 signaling pathway Res. Clin. Cancer 2010 16 5781 5795 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0446 21138870
100. Alexandrow M.G. Song L.J. Altoik S. Gray J. Haura E.B. Kumar N.B. Curcumin: A novel STAT3 pathway inhibitor for chemoprevention of lung cancer Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 2012 21 407 412 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32834ef194 22156994 PMC3319490
101. Xu X. Zhu Y. Curcumin inhibits human non-small cell lung cancer xenografts by targeting the STAT3 pathway Am. J. Transl. Res. 2017 9 3633 3641 28861154 PMC5575177
102. Busquets S. Carbo N. Almendro V. Quiles M.T. Lopez-Soriano F. Argiles J.M. Curcumin, a natural product present in turmeric, decreases tumor growth but does not behave as an anti-cachectic compound in a rat model Cancer Lett. 2001 167 33 38 10.1016/S0304-3835(01)00456-6 11323096
103. McCarthy Beckett D. Pycha K. Berg T. Effects of curcumin on tumor growth and muscle mass in a mouse model of cancer cachexia Oncol. Nurs. Forum 2008 35 455 459 10.1188/08.ONF.455-459
104. Parsons H.A. Baracos V.E. Hong D.S. Abbruzzese J. Bruera E. Kurzorck R. The effects of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer Oncotarget 2016 7 20293 20304 10.18632/oncotarget.7773 26934122 PMC4991455
105. Siddiqui R.A. Hassan S. Harvey K.A. Rasol T. Das T. Mukerji P. DeMichele S. Attenuation of proteolysis and muscle wasting by curcumin c3 complex in MAC16 colon tumor-bearing mice Br. J. Nutr. 2009 102 967 975 10.1017/S0007114509345250 19393114
106. Oelkrug C. Lange C.M. Wenzel E. Fricke S. Hartke M. Simasi J. Schubert A. Analysis of the tumoricidal and anti-cachectic potential of curcumin Anticancer Res. 2014 34 4781 4788 25202058
107. Alamdari N. O’Neal P. Hasselgren P.O. Curcumin and muscle wasting—A new role for an old drug? Nutrition 2009 25 125 129 10.1016/j.nut.2008.09.002 19028079 PMC3258441
108. Pandey M.K. Sung B. Seok K. Aggarwal B.B. Butein suppresses constitutive and inducible signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)3 activation and STAT3-regulated gene products through the induction of a protein tyrosine phosphate SHP-1 Mol Pharmacol. 2009 75 525 533 10.1124/mol.108.052548 19103760 PMC2684906
109. Liu T. Ma H. Shi W. Duan J. Wang Y. Zhang C. Li C. Lin J. Li S. Lv J. Inhibition of STAT3 signaling pathway by ursolic acid suppresses the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma Int. J. Oncol. 2017 51 555 562 10.3892/ijo.2017.4035 28714512