MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s2213-2600(15)00220-9

Медицинская библиотека · The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2015

Spontaneous pneumothorax: time to rethink management?

Bintcliffe Oliver J, Hallifax Rob J, Edey Anthony, Feller-Kopman David, Lee Y C Gary, Marquette Charles H, Tschopp Jean-Marie, West Douglas, Rahman Najib M, Maskell Nick A

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

There are substantial differences in international guidelines for the management of pneumothorax and much geographical variation in clinical practice. These discrepancies have, in part, been driven by a paucity of high-quality evidence. Advances in diagnostic techniques have increasingly allowed the identification of lung abnormalities in patients previously labelled as having primary spontaneous pneumothorax, a group in whom recommended management differs from those with clinically apparent lung disease. Pathophysiological mechanisms underlying pneumothorax are now better understood and this may have implications for clinical management. Risk stratification of patients at baseline could help to identify subgroups at higher risk of recurrent pneumothorax who would benefit from early intervention to prevent recurrence. Further research into the roles of conservative management, Heimlich valves, digital air-leak monitoring, and pleurodesis at first presentation might lead to an increase in their use in the future.

Для цитирования: Bintcliffe Oliver J, Hallifax Rob J, Edey Anthony, Feller-Kopman David, Lee Y C Gary, Marquette Charles H, Tschopp Jean-Marie, West Douglas, Rahman Najib M, Maskell Nick A. Spontaneous pneumothorax: time to rethink management?. The Lancet. Respiratory medicine. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(15)00220-9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.