MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/ccd.ccd_288_18

Медицинская библиотека · Contemporary clinical dentistry · 2018

Dermatoglyphic Analysis in Parents with Cleft Children: A Comparative Study.

Harika D Jaya, Sridevi E, Sai Sankar A J, Pranitha K, Gosla Srinivas Reddy, Kiran G Bhanu

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE

There were studies in the literature which showed the altered dermatoglyphics in the cleft children. But it would be beneficial if probable expression can be proved in prior generations, so that genetic counseling and other preventive measures can be undertaken. The aim of the study is to determine variations in dermatoglyphics of prior generations which would serve as bench markers to predict the occurrence of cleft in off springs.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A total of 400 parents aged between 25-45 years were selected and divided into two groups - Group A consisted of parents with cleft children and Group B comprised of parents with at least 2 healthy children who met the inclusion criteria. Dermatoglyphic prints were collected by ink method and evaluated for pattern types, total ridge count and palm prints were evaluated for a-b ridge count, atd angle and asymmetry.

RESULTS

Significant difference was observed between Group A and B with reference to pattern types; TRC and a-b ridge count and atd angle. Absence of t point was variably noticed in the mothers of affected children.

CONCLUSION

Dermatoglyphics can be used as tool to study the developmental instability of cleft anomalies and provides data to assess the genetic etiology of clefting.

Для цитирования: Harika D Jaya, Sridevi E, Sai Sankar A J, Pranitha K, Gosla Srinivas Reddy, Kiran G Bhanu. Dermatoglyphic Analysis in Parents with Cleft Children: A Comparative Study.. Contemporary clinical dentistry. 2018. DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_288_18.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.