MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1056/nejmoa0800390

Медицинская библиотека · The New England journal of medicine · 2008

Monovalent type 1 oral poliovirus vaccine in newborns.

el-Sayed Nasr, el-Gamal Yehia, Abbassy Ahmed-Amr, Seoud Iman, Salama Maha, Kandeel Amr, Hossny Elham, Shawky Ahmed, Hussein Heba Abou, Pallansch Mark A, van der Avoort Harrie G A M, Burton Anthony H, Sreevatsava Meghana, Malankar Pradeep, Wahdan Mohamed H, Sutter Roland W

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

In 1988, the World Health Assembly resolved to eradicate poliomyelitis. Although substantial progress toward this goal has been made, eradication remains elusive. In 2004, the World Health Organization called for the development of a potentially more immunogenic monovalent type 1 oral poliovirus vaccine.

METHODS

We conducted a trial in Egypt to compare the immunogenicity of a newly licensed monovalent type 1 oral poliovirus vaccine with that of a trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive one dose of monovalent type 1 oral poliovirus vaccine or trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine at birth. Thirty days after birth, a single challenge dose of monovalent type 1 oral poliovirus vaccine was administered in all subjects. Shedding of serotype 1 poliovirus was assessed through day 60.

RESULTS

A total of 530 subjects were enrolled, and 421 fulfilled the study requirements. Thirty days after the study vaccines were administered, the rate of seroconversion to type 1 poliovirus was 55.4% in the monovalent-vaccine group, as compared with 32.1% in the trivalent-vaccine group (P<0.001). Among those with a high reciprocal titer of maternally derived antibodies against type 1 poliovirus (>64), 46.0% of the subjects in the monovalent-vaccine group underwent seroconversion, as compared with 21.3% in the trivalent-vaccine group (P<0.001). Seven days after administration of the challenge dose of monovalent type 1 vaccine, a significantly lower proportion of subjects in the monovalent-vaccine group than in the trivalent-vaccine group excreted type 1 poliovirus (25.9% vs. 41.5%, P=0.001). None of the serious adverse events reported were attributed to the trial interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

When given at birth, monovalent type 1 oral poliovirus vaccine is superior to trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine in inducing humoral antibodies against type 1 poliovirus, overcoming high preexisting levels of maternally derived antibodies, and increasing the resistance to excretion of type 1 poliovirus after administration of a challenge dose. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN76316509.)

Для цитирования: el-Sayed Nasr, el-Gamal Yehia, Abbassy Ahmed-Amr, Seoud Iman, Salama Maha, Kandeel Amr, Hossny Elham, Shawky Ahmed, Hussein Heba Abou, Pallansch Mark A, van der Avoort Harrie G A M, Burton Anthony H, Sreevatsava Meghana, Malankar Pradeep, Wahdan Mohamed H, Sutter Roland W. Monovalent type 1 oral poliovirus vaccine in newborns.. The New England journal of medicine. 2008. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa0800390.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.