MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1155/2022/7344928

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of dentistry · 2022

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Nasal Sedation Midazolam Compared with Dexmedetomidine in the Management of Uncooperative Children with Down Syndrome during Dental Treatment.

Hamod Mohamad Nabil, Kouchaji Chaza, Rostom Faten, Alzoubi Hasan, Katbeh Imad, Tuturov Nikolay

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the intranasal administration of midazolam and dexmedetomidine in uncooperative children with Down syndrome.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The sample consisted of 20 children with Down syndrome aged 5 to 11 years who were divided equally into two groups: Group 1 (experimental) nasal dexmedetomidine and Group 2 (control) nasal midazolam. The efficacy of both the drugs was evaluated according to Ohio State University Behavioral Rating Scale (OSUBRS), University of Michigan scale (UMSS), and Houpt general behavior scale.

RESULTS

Both substances have been effective in the management of children with Down syndrome. There were no statistically significant differences for Ohio State University Behavioral Rating Scale (OSUBRS) (P value = 0.631), University of Michigan scale (UMSS) (P value = 0.739), and Houpt general behavior scale (P value = 0.481).

CONCLUSION

Both midazolam and dexmedetomidine nasal can be used to sedate children with Down syndrome.

Для цитирования: Hamod Mohamad Nabil, Kouchaji Chaza, Rostom Faten, Alzoubi Hasan, Katbeh Imad, Tuturov Nikolay. Evaluation of the Efficacy of Nasal Sedation Midazolam Compared with Dexmedetomidine in the Management of Uncooperative Children with Down Syndrome during Dental Treatment.. International journal of dentistry. 2022. DOI: 10.1155/2022/7344928.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.