British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 1991
Symptoms analysis for the diagnosis of genuine stress incontinence.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Versi E, Cardozo L, Anand D, Cooper D
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of an analysis of symptoms alone for the diagnosis of genuine stress incontinence.
DESIGN: A comparison of results of symptoms analysis with urodynamic findings.
SETTING: A gynaecological video-urodynamic unit.
SUBJECTS: 252 consecutive patients referred for urodynamic investigations.
INTERVENTIONS: A questionnaire of 20 symptoms of lower urinary tract dysfunction, midstream specimen of urine, pad testing, uroflowmetry, and video-cystourethrography.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Using the urodynamic diagnosis as the 'gold standard', the accuracy of discriminant function analysis of symptoms was determined.
RESULTS: Symptoms analysis achieved a correct classification of 81% with a false positive rate of 16%. Use of an accumulative probability curve defines patients who fall into the equivocal range.
CONCLUSIONS: All women presenting with incontinence should undergo preoperative urodynamic studies.
DESIGN: A comparison of results of symptoms analysis with urodynamic findings.
SETTING: A gynaecological video-urodynamic unit.
SUBJECTS: 252 consecutive patients referred for urodynamic investigations.
INTERVENTIONS: A questionnaire of 20 symptoms of lower urinary tract dysfunction, midstream specimen of urine, pad testing, uroflowmetry, and video-cystourethrography.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Using the urodynamic diagnosis as the 'gold standard', the accuracy of discriminant function analysis of symptoms was determined.
RESULTS: Symptoms analysis achieved a correct classification of 81% with a false positive rate of 16%. Use of an accumulative probability curve defines patients who fall into the equivocal range.
CONCLUSIONS: All women presenting with incontinence should undergo preoperative urodynamic studies.