Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
Effects of varying blood flow rate during peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygen (V-A ECMO) on left ventricular function measured by two-dimensional strain.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ng Pauline Yeung, Ma Tammy Sin Kwan, Ip April, Fang Shu, Li Andy Chak Cheung, Wong Alfred Sai Kuen, Ngai Chun Wai, Chan Wai Ming, Sin Wai Ching
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effects of varying blood flow rate during peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygen (V-A ECMO) on left ventricular function measured by two-dimensional strain.
METHODS: Adult patients who were supported by peripheral V-A ECMO were recruited. Serial hemodynamic and cardiac performance parameters were measured by transthoracic echocardiogram within the first 48 h after implementation of V-A ECMO. Measurements at 100%, 120%, and 50% of target blood flow (TBF) were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 54 patients were included and the main indications for V-A ECMO were myocardial infarction [32 (59.3%)] and myocarditis [6 (11.1%)]. With extracorporeal blood flow at 50% compared with 100% TBF, the mean arterial pressure was lower [66 ± 19 vs. 75 ± 18 mmHg, p < 0.001], stroke volume was greater [23 (12-34) vs. 15 (8-26) ml, p < 0.001], and cardiac index was higher [1.2 (0.7-1.7) vs. 0.8 (0.5-1.3) L/min/m2, p < 0.001]. Left ventricular contractile function measured by global longitudinal strain improved at 50% compared with 100% TBF [-2.8 (-7.6- -0.1) vs. -1.2 (-5.2-0) %, p < 0.001]. Similarly, left ventricular ejection fraction increased [24.4 (15.8-35.5) vs. 16.7 (10.0-28.5) %, p < 0.001] and left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral increased [7.7 (3.8-11.4) vs. 4.8 (2.5-8.5) cm, p < 0.001]. Adding echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular systolic function to the Survival After Veno-arterial ECMO (SAVE) score had better discriminatory value in predicting eventual hospital mortality (AUROC 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.84, p = 0.008) and successful weaning from V-A ECMO (AUROC 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.83, p = 0.017).
CONCLUSION: In the initial period of V-A ECMO support, measures of left ventricular function including left ventricular ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain were inversely related to ECMO blood flow rate. Understanding the heart-ECMO interaction is vital to interpretation of echocardiographic measures of the left ventricle while on ECMO.
METHODS: Adult patients who were supported by peripheral V-A ECMO were recruited. Serial hemodynamic and cardiac performance parameters were measured by transthoracic echocardiogram within the first 48 h after implementation of V-A ECMO. Measurements at 100%, 120%, and 50% of target blood flow (TBF) were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 54 patients were included and the main indications for V-A ECMO were myocardial infarction [32 (59.3%)] and myocarditis [6 (11.1%)]. With extracorporeal blood flow at 50% compared with 100% TBF, the mean arterial pressure was lower [66 ± 19 vs. 75 ± 18 mmHg, p < 0.001], stroke volume was greater [23 (12-34) vs. 15 (8-26) ml, p < 0.001], and cardiac index was higher [1.2 (0.7-1.7) vs. 0.8 (0.5-1.3) L/min/m2, p < 0.001]. Left ventricular contractile function measured by global longitudinal strain improved at 50% compared with 100% TBF [-2.8 (-7.6- -0.1) vs. -1.2 (-5.2-0) %, p < 0.001]. Similarly, left ventricular ejection fraction increased [24.4 (15.8-35.5) vs. 16.7 (10.0-28.5) %, p < 0.001] and left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral increased [7.7 (3.8-11.4) vs. 4.8 (2.5-8.5) cm, p < 0.001]. Adding echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular systolic function to the Survival After Veno-arterial ECMO (SAVE) score had better discriminatory value in predicting eventual hospital mortality (AUROC 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.84, p = 0.008) and successful weaning from V-A ECMO (AUROC 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.83, p = 0.017).
CONCLUSION: In the initial period of V-A ECMO support, measures of left ventricular function including left ventricular ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain were inversely related to ECMO blood flow rate. Understanding the heart-ECMO interaction is vital to interpretation of echocardiographic measures of the left ventricle while on ECMO.