Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2025
Assessment of pain location according to different types of bruxism.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Anasız Kıranatlı Burcu, İşisağ Özer
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the influence of bruxism types and frequencies on pain localisation in individuals with temporomandibular disorders (TMD).
METHODS: The study participants included 100 TMD patients. Participants consented to undergo clinical evaluations based on the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Assessment Instruments Protocol (DC/TMD). Pain was determined by palpating the temporal and masseter muscles and the temporomandibular junction (TMJ). The oral behavior checklist (OBC) was used in DC/TMD to assess participants' risk for parafunctional movements and types of bruxism. The parafunctional risk assessment was performed with the assessment method reported by The International Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) Consortium Network.
RESULTS: Most participants are at high risk for parafunction. There was a statistically significant relationship between masseter, temporal and TMJ pain and parafunctional movements (p < 0.05). Masseter pain on palpation showed significant relationships with sleep bruxism and awake grinding frequency (p < 0.05). Temporal muscle pain on palpation showed significant relationships with the presence and frequency of awake clenching (p < 0.05). A significant correlation exists between TMJ pain on palpation and awake grinding and clenching and with awake clenching frequence (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on their frequency and presence, different types of bruxism may be associated with different pain symptoms.
METHODS: The study participants included 100 TMD patients. Participants consented to undergo clinical evaluations based on the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Assessment Instruments Protocol (DC/TMD). Pain was determined by palpating the temporal and masseter muscles and the temporomandibular junction (TMJ). The oral behavior checklist (OBC) was used in DC/TMD to assess participants' risk for parafunctional movements and types of bruxism. The parafunctional risk assessment was performed with the assessment method reported by The International Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) Consortium Network.
RESULTS: Most participants are at high risk for parafunction. There was a statistically significant relationship between masseter, temporal and TMJ pain and parafunctional movements (p < 0.05). Masseter pain on palpation showed significant relationships with sleep bruxism and awake grinding frequency (p < 0.05). Temporal muscle pain on palpation showed significant relationships with the presence and frequency of awake clenching (p < 0.05). A significant correlation exists between TMJ pain on palpation and awake grinding and clenching and with awake clenching frequence (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on their frequency and presence, different types of bruxism may be associated with different pain symptoms.