MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2147/mder.s467146

Медицинская библиотека · Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024

Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Trauma Care: A Preliminary Scoping Review.

Ventura Christian Angelo I, Denton Edward E, David Jessica A

СтатьяScoping ReviewПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This study aimed to analyze the use of generative artificial intelligence in the emergency trauma care setting through a brief scoping review of literature published between 2014 and 2024. An exploration of the NCBI repository was performed using a search string of selected keywords that returned N=87 results; articles that met the inclusion criteria (n=28) were reviewed and analyzed. Heterogeneity sources were explored and identified by a significance threshold of P < 0.10 or an I2 value exceeding 50%. If applicable, articles were categorized within three primary domains: triage, diagnostics, or treatment. Findings suggest that CNNs demonstrate strong diagnostic performance for diverse traumatic injuries, but generalized integration requires expanded prospective multi-center validation. Injury scoring models currently experience calibration gaps in mortality quantification and lesion localization that can undermine clinical utility by permitting false negatives. Triage predictive models now confront transparency, explainability, and healthcare ecosystem integration barriers limiting real-world translation. The most significant literature gap centers on treatment-oriented generative AI applications that provide real-time guidance for urgent trauma interventions rather than just analytical support.

Для цитирования: Ventura Christian Angelo I, Denton Edward E, David Jessica A. Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Trauma Care: A Preliminary Scoping Review.. Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.). 2024. DOI: 10.2147/mder.s467146.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.