Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society · 2013
Testing of midwife neonatal resuscitation skills with a simulator manikin in a low-risk delivery unit.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rovamo Liisa M, Mattila Minna-Maria, Andersson Sture, Rosenberg Per H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Expertise in neonatal resuscitation is essential for personnel involved in the care of newborns. In this observational cohort study the skills of 52 midwives in a simulated scenario were assessed.
METHODS: A total of 52 midwives in a low-risk unit and five specialist nurses in a high-risk unit were tested to establish their competence in newborn resuscitation. The 52 midwives were divided into groups 1 (n = 39; no pretest training) and 2 (n = 13; 1 day training prior to study). The video-recorded test scenario was a newborn with asphyxia. Thirty items were graded by a neonatologist and nursing team in real time. Using the Angoff method, a pass score was 18.71 for skills that were graded 0 or 1.
RESULTS: The average score of specialist nurses was 26 (range, 23-29). A total of 49% of midwives in group 1 and 92% in group 2 passed the test. The average score was 17.7 (range, 9-25) in group 1 and 21.9 (range, 17-27) in group 2. A total of 27% and 77% of midwives in groups 1 and 2, respectively, carried out ventilation at a frequency as per the algorithm. Mask leakage was higher in group 1 (44%) versus group 2 (23%). Five and three midwives in groups 1 and 2, respectively, overexpanded the lungs.
CONCLUSION: Many midwives had imperfect resuscitation skills. A 1 day course improved such skills. The standard scenario is an objective and useful performance marker in assessing and documenting improvements in competence in delivery room resuscitation.
METHODS: A total of 52 midwives in a low-risk unit and five specialist nurses in a high-risk unit were tested to establish their competence in newborn resuscitation. The 52 midwives were divided into groups 1 (n = 39; no pretest training) and 2 (n = 13; 1 day training prior to study). The video-recorded test scenario was a newborn with asphyxia. Thirty items were graded by a neonatologist and nursing team in real time. Using the Angoff method, a pass score was 18.71 for skills that were graded 0 or 1.
RESULTS: The average score of specialist nurses was 26 (range, 23-29). A total of 49% of midwives in group 1 and 92% in group 2 passed the test. The average score was 17.7 (range, 9-25) in group 1 and 21.9 (range, 17-27) in group 2. A total of 27% and 77% of midwives in groups 1 and 2, respectively, carried out ventilation at a frequency as per the algorithm. Mask leakage was higher in group 1 (44%) versus group 2 (23%). Five and three midwives in groups 1 and 2, respectively, overexpanded the lungs.
CONCLUSION: Many midwives had imperfect resuscitation skills. A 1 day course improved such skills. The standard scenario is an objective and useful performance marker in assessing and documenting improvements in competence in delivery room resuscitation.