MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/ejhf.31

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of heart failure · 2013

Selection of a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist for patients with hypertension or heart failure.

Iqbal Javaid, Parviz Yasir, Pitt Bertram, Newell-Price John, Al-Mohammad Abdallah, Zannad Faiez

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Clinical trials have demonstrated morbidity and mortality benefits of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in patients with heart failure. These studies have used either spironolactone or eplerenone as the MRA. It is generally believed that these two agents have the same effects, and the data from studies using one drug could be extrapolated for the other. National and international guidelines do not generally discriminate between spironolactone and eplerenone, but strongly recommend using an MRA for patients with heart failure due to LV systolic dysfunction and post-infarct LV systolic dysfunction. There are no major clinical trials directly comparing the efficacy of these two drugs. This article aims to compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of spironolactone and eplerenone, and to analyse the available data for their cardiovascular indications and adverse effects. We have also addressed the role of special circumstances including co-morbidities, concomitant drug therapy, cost, and licensing restrictions in choosing an appropriate MRA for a particular patient, thus combining an evidence-based approach with personalized medicine.

Для цитирования: Iqbal Javaid, Parviz Yasir, Pitt Bertram, Newell-Price John, Al-Mohammad Abdallah, Zannad Faiez. Selection of a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist for patients with hypertension or heart failure.. European journal of heart failure. 2013. DOI: 10.1111/ejhf.31.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.