Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2010
Primary care approach to dysphonia.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Turley Richard, Cohen Seth
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To understand how primary care physicians manage patients with dysphonia and the barriers they face when evaluating patients for voice problems.
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.
SETTING: Primary care community.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 933 internal and family medicine physicians were randomly selected from a database of physicians in a referral basin of a tertiary care medical center and mailed a questionnaire. Questions concerned physician comfort level in recognizing an abnormal voice, their view of the quality of life impact of dysphonia, frequency of evaluating patients for voice problems, barriers to the evaluation of voice problems, reasons for referral, and common treatments prior to referral.
RESULTS: A total of 271 physicians responded, for a response rate of 29.0 percent. Of those who responded, 36.5 percent routinely evaluate their patients for voice problems. Reasons for not evaluating patients for voice problems were patients not complaining about hoarseness, more pressing issues, not feeling comfortable assessing patients for voice problems, and time constraints. Chronic voice changes and not being able to understand patients' speech were the most common reasons for referral. Reflux and allergy treatment were common treatment modalities prior to referral. A total of 67.5 percent of respondents were interested in learning more about voice problems.
CONCLUSION: Primary care physicians face limitations with respect to evaluating patients for voice problems. Otolaryngologists must continue outreach efforts and collaboration with primary care colleagues in order to enhance the screening for voice problems.
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.
SETTING: Primary care community.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 933 internal and family medicine physicians were randomly selected from a database of physicians in a referral basin of a tertiary care medical center and mailed a questionnaire. Questions concerned physician comfort level in recognizing an abnormal voice, their view of the quality of life impact of dysphonia, frequency of evaluating patients for voice problems, barriers to the evaluation of voice problems, reasons for referral, and common treatments prior to referral.
RESULTS: A total of 271 physicians responded, for a response rate of 29.0 percent. Of those who responded, 36.5 percent routinely evaluate their patients for voice problems. Reasons for not evaluating patients for voice problems were patients not complaining about hoarseness, more pressing issues, not feeling comfortable assessing patients for voice problems, and time constraints. Chronic voice changes and not being able to understand patients' speech were the most common reasons for referral. Reflux and allergy treatment were common treatment modalities prior to referral. A total of 67.5 percent of respondents were interested in learning more about voice problems.
CONCLUSION: Primary care physicians face limitations with respect to evaluating patients for voice problems. Otolaryngologists must continue outreach efforts and collaboration with primary care colleagues in order to enhance the screening for voice problems.