MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Medecine et maladies infectieuses · 2004

[Regional variations of adult population vaccinal status].

Beytout J, Denis F, Giet R, Allaert F A

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The authors had for aim to study the regional variations of vaccination coverage in adult population.

METHODS

Cross-sectional epidemiological study, including a representative sample of 2122 general practitioners and analyzed according to eight French regions.

RESULTS

Six thousand two hundred sixty-nine patients, 44 +/- 15 old, were included in the study. 90.5% of the patients were vaccinated against diphtheria, 94.4% against tetanus, and 92.6% against poliomyelitis. No difference between regions was noted but the rate of patients with up to date vaccination strongly differed, ranging from 54.8% (Paris/Ile de France) to 64.3% (South West) for diphtheria, from 60.4% (Paris/Ile de France) to 73% (South West) for tetanus, and from 58.8% (Paris/Ile de France) to 69.8% (South West) for poliomyelitis. Vaccination coverage against measles, parotiditis, hepatitis A and B, typhoid fever, yellow fever also significantly differed between regions and the only ones evenly distributed were vaccination against tuberculosis, meningococcus, and pneumococcus.

CONCLUSION

These results show insufficient vaccination coverage against diphtheria, tetanus, and poliomyelitis in all regions and show other important variations in vaccination coverage between regions, especially for hepatitis A and B.

Для цитирования: Beytout J, Denis F, Giet R, Allaert F A. [Regional variations of adult population vaccinal status].. Medecine et maladies infectieuses. 2004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.