MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/scs.0000000000000610

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2014

Comparison of the osteogenic potential of OsteoSelect demineralized bone matrix putty to NovaBone calcium-phosphosilicate synthetic putty in a cranial defect model.

Schallenberger Mark A, Rossmeier Kerri, Lovick Helena M, Meyer Todd R, Aberman Harold M, Juda Gregory A

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The purpose of this study was to compare the osteogenic potential of a synthetic and a demineralized bone matrix (DBM) putty using a cranial defect model in New Zealand white rabbits. Paired, bilateral critical-size defects (10 mm) were prepared in the frontal bones of 12 rabbits and filled with either OsteoSelect DBM Putty or NovaBone calcium-phosphosilicate putty. At days 43 and 91, 6 rabbits were killed and examined via semiquantitative histology and quantitative histomorphometry. Defects filled with the DBM putty were histologically associated with less inflammation and fibrous tissue in the defect and more new bone than the synthetic counterpart at both time points. Histomorphometric analysis revealed that the defects filled with DBM putty were associated with significantly more bone formation at day 43 (70.7% vs 40.7%, P = 0.043) and at day 91 (70.4% vs 39.9%, P = 0.0044). The amount of residual implant was similar for both test groups at each time point.

Для цитирования: Schallenberger Mark A, Rossmeier Kerri, Lovick Helena M, Meyer Todd R, Aberman Harold M, Juda Gregory A. Comparison of the osteogenic potential of OsteoSelect demineralized bone matrix putty to NovaBone calcium-phosphosilicate synthetic putty in a cranial defect model.. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000000610.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.