European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie · 2001
High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation in congenital diaphragmatic hernia.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cacciari A, Ruggeri G, Mordenti M, Ceccarelli P L, Baccarini E, Pigna A, Gentili A
Аннотация
AIMS: Newborns affected by congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) are high-risk patients: today the mortality is still elevated and is essentially due to severe pulmonary hypoplasia, pulmonary hypertension and the absence of surfactant. High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation (HFOV) seems to be a good pre- and postoperative technique in cases of CDH.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report our experience in the treatment of CDH; since 1987 we have followed 44 patients. We divided them into two different groups in accordance with the ventilation technique used: Group I (1987-1994): 25 patients treated with conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV); Group II (1994-1997): 19 patients treated with HFOV used since the first day of life until clinical stabilisation and also prolonged during surgery and in the postoperative period.
RESULTS: 37 patients (84%) underwent surgery with closure of the diaphragmatic defect. We had a very good improvement in survival, rising from 67% (CMV) to 94% (HFOV) of the patients operated on, reaching an overall survival of 56% vs 79%.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of HFOV for the treatment of CDH has proved to be a valuable technique for pre-operative stabilisation and for intra- and postoperative respiratory treatment, above all for newborns with CDH.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report our experience in the treatment of CDH; since 1987 we have followed 44 patients. We divided them into two different groups in accordance with the ventilation technique used: Group I (1987-1994): 25 patients treated with conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV); Group II (1994-1997): 19 patients treated with HFOV used since the first day of life until clinical stabilisation and also prolonged during surgery and in the postoperative period.
RESULTS: 37 patients (84%) underwent surgery with closure of the diaphragmatic defect. We had a very good improvement in survival, rising from 67% (CMV) to 94% (HFOV) of the patients operated on, reaching an overall survival of 56% vs 79%.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of HFOV for the treatment of CDH has proved to be a valuable technique for pre-operative stabilisation and for intra- and postoperative respiratory treatment, above all for newborns with CDH.