The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2017
The IADPSG diagnostic criteria identify women with increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in Victoria.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Abell Sally K, Teede Helena J
Аннотация
Controversy remains surrounding International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), including perceived improvement in perinatal outcomes and health service implications. We compared perinatal outcomes for untreated women meeting IADPSG-only criteria and women without GDM in Victoria. Women meeting IADPSG-only criteria were characterised according to fasting and one hour glucose thresholds and by region of birth. IADPSG criteria identified women with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, particularly women born in Australia compared to Asian regions.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAge FactorsAsiaBirth WeightBody Mass IndexCesarean SectionDiabetes, GestationalDystociaFastingFemaleFetal MacrosomiaGlucose Tolerance TestHumansHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedInfant, Small for Gestational AgeMedical Record LinkagePractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesVictoriaYoung Adult