Journal of spinal disorders & techniques · 2014
Clinical and computed tomographic evaluation of safety and efficacy of facet screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aota Yoichi, Honda Atsushi, Saito Tomoyuki
Аннотация
DESIGN: A retrospective study comparing screw positioning and associated complications between 2 different facet screw placement methods.
OBJECTIVE: To review the anatomic location, clinical safety, efficacy, and limitations of 2 facet screw placement techniques.
BACKGROUND: Facet screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine penetrates 4 cortical layers and affords better stability than lateral mass screws. Takayasu and colleagues recommended placing screws in the sagittal plane. We modified the trajectory to direct the screws laterally from the sagittal plane to place the root at less risk and improve fixation by increasing the excursion of the screws into bone. No clinical reports exist describing the quadricortical facet screw placed in a lateral direction.
METHODS: A total of 95 screws were used in 18 consecutive patients who underwent posterior cervical stabilization for various spinal disorders: 34 screws used sagittal plane screw placement and 61 used our technique. Screw-related complications were reviewed. Screw trajectories and screw tip positions related to the ventral cortical margin and vertebral artery were evaluated using postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomograms taken within 6 months after surgery. Instrumentation failures were evaluated from postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomograms taken 2 years after surgery.
RESULTS: There was 1 complication, nerve root irritation due to screw malposition. Postoperative computed tomographic images revealed that drilling was 30 degrees lateral from the sagittal plane in our method. Fourth cortex penetration failed in 29% of the screws placed in the sagittal plane and in 5% by our method. Screw loosening was significantly increased using screws placed in the sagittal plane (24% vs. 2%).
CONCLUSIONS: Quadricortical facet screw placement aimed at the juncture between the transverse process and the facet is practicable. Screw loosening was significantly reduced using this lateral screw direction. One of the disadvantages of this technique is that extensive cranial exposure is required to align the instruments in the proper sagittal trajectory.
OBJECTIVE: To review the anatomic location, clinical safety, efficacy, and limitations of 2 facet screw placement techniques.
BACKGROUND: Facet screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine penetrates 4 cortical layers and affords better stability than lateral mass screws. Takayasu and colleagues recommended placing screws in the sagittal plane. We modified the trajectory to direct the screws laterally from the sagittal plane to place the root at less risk and improve fixation by increasing the excursion of the screws into bone. No clinical reports exist describing the quadricortical facet screw placed in a lateral direction.
METHODS: A total of 95 screws were used in 18 consecutive patients who underwent posterior cervical stabilization for various spinal disorders: 34 screws used sagittal plane screw placement and 61 used our technique. Screw-related complications were reviewed. Screw trajectories and screw tip positions related to the ventral cortical margin and vertebral artery were evaluated using postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomograms taken within 6 months after surgery. Instrumentation failures were evaluated from postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomograms taken 2 years after surgery.
RESULTS: There was 1 complication, nerve root irritation due to screw malposition. Postoperative computed tomographic images revealed that drilling was 30 degrees lateral from the sagittal plane in our method. Fourth cortex penetration failed in 29% of the screws placed in the sagittal plane and in 5% by our method. Screw loosening was significantly increased using screws placed in the sagittal plane (24% vs. 2%).
CONCLUSIONS: Quadricortical facet screw placement aimed at the juncture between the transverse process and the facet is practicable. Screw loosening was significantly reduced using this lateral screw direction. One of the disadvantages of this technique is that extensive cranial exposure is required to align the instruments in the proper sagittal trajectory.