Zhonghua nan ke xue = National journal of andrology · 2025
[Statin drugs for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: An umbrella review].
СтатьяСистематический обзорАннотация на английскомНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Ze, Zhang Pei-Hai, Liu Mei-Jun, Zhang Tao
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to re-evaluate the systematic reviews and meta-analyses on statins for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) and construct an umbrella review, thereby providing robust evidence-based for the clinical application of statins in ED treatment.
METHODS: A comprehensive computerized search was conducted across CNKI, Wanfang Database, VIP, WOS, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases from their inception to September 12, 2024, for all systematic reviews and meta-analyses addressing statin interventions in ED. The methodological quality, reporting quality, and evidence quality of the included studies were assessed and summarized using PRISMA 2020, AMSTAR 2, and GRADE systems.
RESULTS: Four systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included. According to the AMSTAR 2 evaluation, one paper was rated as low quality, while the remaining three were classified as very low quality. PRISMA 2020 evaluation results indicated that the average score of the four included studies was 29, with all being of medium quality but exhibiting partial deficiencies. The proportion of fully consistent items across the four studies ranged from 52.38% to 80.95%. GRADE system tool evaluation revealed 11 outcome indicators, of which only one was rated as intermediate evidence. The remainders were categorized as low or very low evidence, with no high-quality evidence identified.
CONCLUSION: Statins demonstrate efficacy in treating ED. However, the current quality of relevant systematic reviews is suboptimal, with notable deficiencies in methodological, reporting, and evidential quality. Further high-quality studies are warranted to provide more reliable evidence-based medical guidance for clinical practice.
METHODS: A comprehensive computerized search was conducted across CNKI, Wanfang Database, VIP, WOS, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases from their inception to September 12, 2024, for all systematic reviews and meta-analyses addressing statin interventions in ED. The methodological quality, reporting quality, and evidence quality of the included studies were assessed and summarized using PRISMA 2020, AMSTAR 2, and GRADE systems.
RESULTS: Four systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included. According to the AMSTAR 2 evaluation, one paper was rated as low quality, while the remaining three were classified as very low quality. PRISMA 2020 evaluation results indicated that the average score of the four included studies was 29, with all being of medium quality but exhibiting partial deficiencies. The proportion of fully consistent items across the four studies ranged from 52.38% to 80.95%. GRADE system tool evaluation revealed 11 outcome indicators, of which only one was rated as intermediate evidence. The remainders were categorized as low or very low evidence, with no high-quality evidence identified.
CONCLUSION: Statins demonstrate efficacy in treating ED. However, the current quality of relevant systematic reviews is suboptimal, with notable deficiencies in methodological, reporting, and evidential quality. Further high-quality studies are warranted to provide more reliable evidence-based medical guidance for clinical practice.