MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2007.07347.x

Медицинская библиотека · BJU international · 2007

Single-institution experience with primary tumours of the male urethra.

Gillitzer Rolf, Hampel Christian, Wiesner Christoph, Hadaschik Boris, Thüroff Joachim

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To assess primary tumours of the urethra in males.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our database from 1986 to 2006 for primary tumours of the male urethra; nine patients with primary tumours of the urethra were analysed and follow-up information was obtained.

RESULTS

Three patients had tumours of the prostatic urethra, two of which had proliferating focal inflammation and one a low-grade, superficial urothelial cancer. All patients were treated successfully with transurethral resection. Six patients had carcinoma of the bulbar or penile urethra, including two with previous local percutaneous radiotherapy for prostate cancer. All had primary surgical excision that was adapted to tumour location and extension. One patient had adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. All but one patient remain recurrence-free after a median follow-up of 20 months.

CONCLUSION

Primary carcinoma of the male urethra is a rare entity. Previous radiotherapy might be a predisposing factor. Local surgical tumour control is essential for long-term survival, but the extent of surgery depends on tumour location and stage. Multimodal therapy might be required to obtain an optimum oncological outcome.

Для цитирования: Gillitzer Rolf, Hampel Christian, Wiesner Christoph, Hadaschik Boris, Thüroff Joachim. Single-institution experience with primary tumours of the male urethra.. BJU international. 2007. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2007.07347.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.