The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2003
Detection of fetal growth restriction in patients with chronic hypertension: is it feasible?
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chauhan S P, Magann E F, Velthius S, Nunn S L, Reynolds D, Scardo J A, Sanderson M, Thigpen B D, Martin J N
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of sonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) in diagnosing intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR, birth weight < 10% for gestational age) in patients with chronic hypertension.
METHODS: All pregnant patients with hypertension delivered during a 5-year period at three centers were identified retrospectively. Patients with gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, diabetes mellitus, fetal anomalies and absence of a sonographic examination within 3 weeks of delivery were excluded. Likelihood ratio (LR) and guidelines established by the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group were used to determine whether sonographic EFW is a reliable diagnostic test to detect IUGR.
RESULTS: At the three centers, there were 264 patients with chronic hypertension (122, 77 and 65 at centers I, II and III, respectively). The incidence of IUGR ranged from 13% to 27% but was similar at the three locations (p = 0.064). The LR (with 95% confidence interval (CI)) of detecting IUGR was 4.4 (95% CI 2.5, 7.7), 2.3 (95% CI 1.4, 3.7) and 6.1 (95% CI 2.7, 13.7) at centers I, II and III, respectively. Based on the proportions of abnormal growth, we required 253 and 71 newborns with fetal growth restriction at centers I and II, respectively, to have narrow confidence intervals around the clinically important LR of 10. The extremely low incidence of IUGR at center III (13%) precluded the estimation of required sample size.
CONCLUSION: Use of Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group guidelines indicates that sonographic EFW is slightly to moderately useful in detecting fetal growth restriction in patients with chronic hypertension.
METHODS: All pregnant patients with hypertension delivered during a 5-year period at three centers were identified retrospectively. Patients with gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, diabetes mellitus, fetal anomalies and absence of a sonographic examination within 3 weeks of delivery were excluded. Likelihood ratio (LR) and guidelines established by the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group were used to determine whether sonographic EFW is a reliable diagnostic test to detect IUGR.
RESULTS: At the three centers, there were 264 patients with chronic hypertension (122, 77 and 65 at centers I, II and III, respectively). The incidence of IUGR ranged from 13% to 27% but was similar at the three locations (p = 0.064). The LR (with 95% confidence interval (CI)) of detecting IUGR was 4.4 (95% CI 2.5, 7.7), 2.3 (95% CI 1.4, 3.7) and 6.1 (95% CI 2.7, 13.7) at centers I, II and III, respectively. Based on the proportions of abnormal growth, we required 253 and 71 newborns with fetal growth restriction at centers I and II, respectively, to have narrow confidence intervals around the clinically important LR of 10. The extremely low incidence of IUGR at center III (13%) precluded the estimation of required sample size.
CONCLUSION: Use of Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group guidelines indicates that sonographic EFW is slightly to moderately useful in detecting fetal growth restriction in patients with chronic hypertension.