JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons · 2004
Operative laparoscopy in pregnancy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Carter James F, Soper David E
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: We compared the surgical outcomes of pregnant women undergoing laparotomy in the first 2 trimesters of pregnancy with those undergoing laparoscopy for the management of acute pelvic pain.
METHODS: We performed a systematic retrospective chart review of patients whose discharge diagnosis included intrauterine pregnancy with exploratory laparotomy or laparoscopy from August 1, 1993 to October 31, 1999. The following factors were assessed: preoperative diagnosis, postoperative diagnosis, gestational age at the time of surgery, operative time, hospital stay, pathology, gestational age at delivery, complications, and outcome of the pregnancy in both groups.
RESULTS: Sixteen pregnant patients underwent surgery during the study period. All but one had abdominopelvic pain, and all patients had an associated adnexal mass. The mean gestation age at the time of surgery was 15+/-6 weeks versus 13+/-4 weeks in the laparoscopic and laparotomy groups, respectively (P=NS). All patients undergoing laparoscopy remained in the hospital for one day compared with a mean of 4.4+/-1.1 days in the laparotomy group (P<0.0001). Pregnancy outcomes were similar and uniformly good.
CONCLUSION: Laparotomy can be avoided and pregnant patients managed safely by operative laparoscopy, with shorter hospital stays.
METHODS: We performed a systematic retrospective chart review of patients whose discharge diagnosis included intrauterine pregnancy with exploratory laparotomy or laparoscopy from August 1, 1993 to October 31, 1999. The following factors were assessed: preoperative diagnosis, postoperative diagnosis, gestational age at the time of surgery, operative time, hospital stay, pathology, gestational age at delivery, complications, and outcome of the pregnancy in both groups.
RESULTS: Sixteen pregnant patients underwent surgery during the study period. All but one had abdominopelvic pain, and all patients had an associated adnexal mass. The mean gestation age at the time of surgery was 15+/-6 weeks versus 13+/-4 weeks in the laparoscopic and laparotomy groups, respectively (P=NS). All patients undergoing laparoscopy remained in the hospital for one day compared with a mean of 4.4+/-1.1 days in the laparotomy group (P<0.0001). Pregnancy outcomes were similar and uniformly good.
CONCLUSION: Laparotomy can be avoided and pregnant patients managed safely by operative laparoscopy, with shorter hospital stays.