Endovascular treatment of acute thoracic aortic syndromes with a proximal landing zone extension strategy: procedural and follow-up results.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To report the procedural and long-term follow-up data (mean, 43 ± 29 months; range, 12-90 months) of endovascular stent grafting (ESG) of acute thoracic aortic syndromes (ATAS) with a proximal landing zone extension strategy.
METHODS
From November 1999 to May 2008, 26 patients (25 males, 1 female; mean age, 57.9 ± 17 years) with ATAS underwent ESG at our institution. Underlying pathologies were: penetrating aortic ulcer (n=7); rupture of a descending aorta aneurysm (n=5), post-traumatic false aneurysm (n=5); acute type B dissection (n=6) and traumatic descending aorta transection (n=3).
RESULTS
ESG was performed successfully in all patients. In 5 patients (19%), an extra-anatomic revascularization of the supra-aortic vessels was performed. In 19 patients (73%), overstenting of the left subclavian artery, without preliminary revascularization, was performed. The mean proximal landing zone length was 57 ± 19 mm. No intraprocedural deaths occurred; 3 patients died postoperatively (1 from an unrelated cause, 1 from a myocardial infarction and 1 for the sequelae of an ischemic stroke). One patient underwent cardiac surgery for post-procedural retrograde type-A dissection. Follow up involved a computed tomography (CT) scan at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, then yearly thereafter. At follow up, no deaths or major complications occurred. The CT scans revealed 1 small type-IB endoleak at 1 year.
CONCLUSION
In ATAS patients treated with ESG, the extension of the proximal landing zone, despite the need of subclavian coverage or hybrid procedures, is associated with an immediate procedural outcome and low morbidity at follow-up.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.